"Every win for Hopkins does not become a win for Calzaghe" WRONG!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dark Sider, Oct 20, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    As far as what? Hopkins is a ****ing idiot. That's my explanation.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Yeah, people can read. There is no argument here. I saw to that.
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Stick to the gay **** you were talking about. It's more your style.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Cleverly, Hopkins didn't throw punches because he's a ****ing idiot. Profound, eh?
     
  5. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008

    that did actually make me laugh.
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Alright lads, almost 6:00am my time. It's been fun..
     
  7. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    Dib isn't from the UK.

    Australia via Lebanon I believe.

    And don't cry like a *****, just because you're a Yank who can't handle his drink, and is therefore jealous of those of us who aren't shitting our own pants after downing more than 4 bass shandys.

    That a boy.
     
  8. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    Joe ain`t got all those blemishes on his record like Hopkins has. :D
     
  9. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    Okay this is way too far. Every win for Hopkins IS NOT a win for Calzaghe and Hopkins isn't in his prime.

    This is one of the worst posts I have ever seen, totally stupid.
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    Winning a close decision is hardly butt****ing, unless you're that desperate. Calzaghe won the fight and clearly, though Hopkins wasn't in his prime at 42 either, he's always dangerous but not prime. There's no need to be all emotional about it. P4P Calzaghe is ahead of him, in terms of general accomplishments Hopkins wins. In the end both are ATGs.
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    I'll give you some drugs with that.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    :lol: dumbest thread ever.
     
  13. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    Of course it does, it makes Joe's win over Hopkins look way better as poeple tried to discredit his win there. That was a great win and possibly the best on his record too, no one can take that away from him and Hopkins' performance recently proves it. :good
     
  14. yorkshire_boy

    yorkshire_boy Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    You just mentioned Taylor was another fight in happened in.... do you not see the link? Hopkins would struggle to throw a lot of punches against these two over 12 rounds because of their speed. Pavlik is stationery, an easier to hit target. Do you disagree with that?

    To say Hopkins threw less punches against Calzaghe compared to Pavlik "cos he chose not to even though he could have" isn't true... if he could have thrown more, he would have! Did you notice how tired he was in the later rounds?

    Going on your basis, in the Hopkins fight, Calzaghe didn't throw the thousand punches he threw against Lacy because he chose not to - absolutely nothing to do with Hopkins being much better than Lacy is it?
     
  15. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,005
    1,860
    Oct 13, 2008
    +1