LOL you're becoming as obsessed with me as you are with Calzaghe, even fabricating the truth... I said Hopkins was clearly a better fighter, as his fight proved, but a legend, no, a very good fighter, yes. I also noted that when i explained the actual context of our intial debate yesterday, people agreed with Hopkins being the better name on Joes resume than Hopkins had over Joe. I'm starting to worry about your sexually deviant thoughts towards British men and clear obsession towards us!
if he fought and dominated guys like quartey,mosely and forrest then in my eyes he would be ATG worthy as he didnt he doesent qualify 4 legend status
yes. people are forgetting how dominant this guy was in his prime, barring looking like **** in losses against hopkins and wright. campas, carr, vargas, joppy, reid, whitaker, dlh, mayorga etc..... that's a better resume than some one like mosley.
This shouldn't even be a question. I'm surprised there's votes for NO!!!? Wow. He is without a doubt a legend