HOPKINS v HAGLER! 2 answers please: P4P GREATNESS, and H2H Match-Up

Hagler!
I gave Hopkins lots of credit on his win against Pavlik but im not overrating his win against a man who doesnt have that great of a resume.

 

arent you bored of bernard because your boring the **** out of me with this endless subjective nuthuggery.

lol.

 

(My emphasis.)


You posted this in a different thread. Now, words have meaning: if you're "indifferent" to his viewpoints and threads, then there should be no reason to reply to them; furthermore, you say (in regards to PACFAN) "[...]we need not bother one another again", only to go and further stink up one of his threads?

 

are you his mom?

the fact that you pasted my response to him in another thread into this one and have the audacity to whine about me stinking up his threads with the aforementioned post while posting it here just for the point of posting it here is laughable..why didnt you just reply in the thread it originated from you lemming

hypocrisy and the term "double standards" are clearly lost on you,yes i replied to him again following that post in response to him bumping up a thread of mine with an insult after the aforementioned post i would have let it be but he clearly wants to play,it is called responding accordingly you imbecile,now **** off back to kindergarden and butt into your contemporaries little scuffles not mine

 

I'm pretty satisfied with my pick winning pct.
I picked Cotto but gave Margarito very good chance to win.
But Pavlik-Hopkins was hard to swallow. I was so sure!!
Making the wrong pick is not that bad. Worst is when you insult someone..and then he's right. I asked to a poster here if he ever watch boxing after he said Pavlik was going to get ****ed up...
I wont do it again. (can't promise...)

 

1. Hagler easily.

2. Hagler in 15, Hopkins in a 12 rounder

 

oh you made a funny of me and made me very mad, oh so original.

lol.

----

Err, anyway, I must be amazing as I'm both a mum, and a toddler! That's some real original stuff there, and quite mature, too. (Also, it's "kindergarten", not "kindergarden".) Now, I didn't see whatever "nasty stuff" he said to you in some old thread of yours; however, I can assure you there's no "double standard" on my part, only your lack of standard: I haven't been here long, but all I've seen you post up until now, has been inane drivel, i.e. completely worthless.

 

1. I would say Hagler, but Hopkins is not finished.

2. Hagler; Hopkins would have had a tough time with the big wins of Hagler. Hagler would have had an easier time with Hopkins big wins.

 

Pacman84...

I resonded to you twice the other day in this thread, but the site was moving so slow my long ass post didn't take.

I'll touch on this briefly later...

 

Oh Shiiiiiit i just discovered this thread. Guess who I think is the greatest to both of the questions...Although I will be looking for & changing my avatar to a B-Hop one soon until the end of the end of the year out of respect to him.

 

In my boxing dreams tonight !!! This would have been a GREAT trilogy !!!

 

kinda makes u think if a light hitting calzaghe was putting pressure on B-hop, Hagler would of been a nightmare for B-hop. B-hop is great, but i think no one since Carlos Monzon or Sugar Ray Robinson would beat a prime Hagler. the only other losses other than Leonards, which was controversial and i'd have Leonard beating B-hop the same way RJJ did, Hagler avenged in quick ko's. B-hop would have to be running all night and he'd have to slow down eventually.

 

They are talking about a prime bhop:nut What were you thinking???????? Hops is old ass hell and cant fight like that anymore so go do your reasearch man. Hops took tons of pressure from echols in his prime and showed no signs of fatigue so please keep track of prime and present. TWO DIFFERENT THINGSatsch

 

P4P: edge to Hagler.
Head to head: Hagler UD.

 

1. Hagler
2. i dont know, it could go either way honestly