In the end Pavlik will be a bigger star then Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vincent Gottschalk, Oct 21, 2008.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Look how many stars America had then... who has America got now? Pavlik and Dawson, of course Pavliks going to be a star, he was the great hope, now theres only Dawson left.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    I hope they do give Dawson the hype, the man deserves it and has the tools to back it up.
     
  3. Gatekeeper78

    Gatekeeper78 Active Member Full Member

    674
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    I enoyed watching Hopkins beat the crap out of your boyfriend.:vonnecunt
     
  4. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Guys like Hopkins and Winky and purist like you who follow them is wants killing boxing:dead we can only hope that the Pavlik's and Duddy's of the world can save boxing in the end:hat
     
  5. Gatekeeper78

    Gatekeeper78 Active Member Full Member

    674
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    You are right that some young guys need to rise to the ocasion, I doubt Pavlic will do it though. Pavlic was arrogant going into the Hopkins fight, thats why I was rooting for Hopkins so much. If he wasn't so arrogant he could of performed better. If he learned a lesson in humility he might prove me wrong. But only he can do that.

    :lama
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    How is Hopkins killing boxing?, if anything he can bring one of the biggest fights in boxing next year by fighting either RJJ in a rematch or Calzaghe, the RJJ rematch would be HUGE. How is that killing boxing?

    The way Pavlik fought like a walking heavybag is what kills boxing, what Hopkins did is what a master boxer would do even at 43. Don't like it?, UFC is available, boxing is better without fans like you.
     
  7. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,007
    1,865
    Oct 13, 2008
    Pavlik got rolled. It wouldn't have been nearly so bad except for the "we're going to KO Hopkins" presumption coming from Youngstown.

    Kelly will be back, and he has a chance to be a bigger star than Hopkins, I agree. But ease up on the bitterness or you'll end up sounding like Edison Miranda bootlickers after the Pavlik fight.
     
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    In the end..there can be only ONE!
     
  9. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    :nono Because only hard core boxing purist who like cuty pie stylist wound want to see Hopkins vs Jones 2 after all there first fight was a dude:tired number two would be also. Samething with a Slappy Joe vs Hopkins fight 2 the first one sucked who gonna want to **** in a ring 2:barf And big deal Hopkins who is a true light heavyweight beat a true middleweight in Pavlik :blood Bottom line is Pavlik at 160 is in tip top shape at 169 he is really not he not fast and has no spring in legs and snap on punches much like Hopkins fight with Winky Hopkins was not fighting a guy at his best:bart
    A Hopkins win Pavlik was the worst thing for boxing just as having guys Calzaghe and Jones on the top of heap in boxing is because there on way out and there careers are at a dead end:verysad It will be a fine day when we are ride of these **** heads and can say bye bye ass holes:hi:
     
  10. KMcDee

    KMcDee New Member Full Member

    56
    0
    Oct 22, 2008
    I have to agree with Vincent.

    The Pavlik vs. Hopkins fight was a joke with no impact of Pavlik's future, re:

    I've been a lurker on this site and enjoy reading all the comments. I respect divergent opinions. Nevetheless, I admit I'm confused about today's state of boxing vs. years ago. Case in point is the recent Pavlik vs. Hopkins fight.

    First, I believe Pavlik was outboxed by Hopkins. But, what did Pavlik lose ? A perfect record, which few fighters achieve. He did not fight for his middleweight belt or a title fight. He did put lots of money in his bank account, and at 4 to 1 odds, if I was a betting man, I may have betted against myself.

    Second, these catchweight fights are similar to wrestling matches. Here, Pavlik moves up two weight classes from middleweight to Lt Heavy weight for a non-title fight ? He never fought at that weight before, I think ? What happened to tune up fights and fighting up through the ranks in a certain weight class ?

    Third, if Hopkins was fighting for the middleweight belt, I think the Pavik performance factor may have been different.

    Fourth, De La Hoya was stopped by Hopkins, yet the naysayers have little problem paying to see him fight PacMan or other ridiculous bouts that again are non-title fights. And, no one says De La Hoya was exposed or a bum when he had to stop fighting due to a body shot by Hopkins.

    Finally, these professional fighters are at such a higher level that it is not beyond reason to make these fights sparring matches or a day at the gym for them. They can hedge on output, hold back on knockouts, and do just about anything to let you think it was a true fight. It is snake oil and smoke and mirrors with suckers paying to see these stupid fights.

    So, this fight sustains Hopkins as an aging fighter who can fight Jones or Calzaghe (sic) again for more money. It sustains these guys for a few more years. If they were such greats why not fight for the middleweight belt or a championship bout ?

    I can see no gain for Pavik for taking this fight other than a big pay day and being assured of future fights by the match makers.

    I also think that Pavik will be back and clean up the middle weight division. He is young, hits hard, and needs a few adjustments.

    These are solely my own personal opinions.

    Cheers,

    KMcD
     
  11. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Maybe but that is not what boxing is about. Boxing is about proving yourself against the best and beating them not about beeing a star. It´s a sport not a show.
     
  12. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008


    Stop posting the same garbage on every thread.

    1.If you agree with Vincent(who thinks Kelly is an ATG and Hop a myth) your a complete donkey whos opinion is irrelevant.

    2. Hes fought at/around 170 4 times, not including Taylor II

    3. Bhop,Calzaghe and RJJ have a combined age of 119 and more championship belts than you have brain cells, if they only want Big Money Fights now who are we to argue.

    Your boy got taken to school, get over it and look forward to big fights for him at MW(where he can at least try and be competitive)
     
  13. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    The bottom line is Pavlik was a sick man going into Hopkins fight if Kelly was 100% he would have knocked the jail byrd out:bbb
     
  14. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008

    The bottom line is Pav got his arse handed to him in a very public way, and it doesnt matter if he was ill coz in his last fight before Hop he had a Lockett so he should have been fine.:yep
     
  15. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    I really question what kind of star are we talking here ?

    Will Pavlik ultimatly get Gatti fame or Sugrar Ray Leonard fame ?