Jones: "Hopkins Lost The Calzaghe Fight Because Of The 'White Boy' Comment"

If you beleive in Karma than its not that rediculous !

 

Roy is just trying to influence the judges to favor him.

Basically he is saying "Hopkins got a hard deal because he is black. Now, you don't want to give another black boy a hard deal, do you?"

Roy has actually said several times that Joe clearly won the fight. He even said so right after the fight. However, after he made a deal to fight Joe - he is being tactical. That's all it is. Let's hope the judges are too intelligent to fall for that and judge the fight fairly. I like both Joe and Roy. I think Roy has the better looking style, but I know that Joe's style is hugely effective and I wouldn't ant to see Joe get the loss in a fight he actually won just because I like Roy's style more. I want the best guy to win.

 

amen

 

its being blown out of proportion

jones said on a setanta interview and post fight he thought joe won it.

 

Well, he is ****ing ugly. :-(

 

Joe Calzaghe 116-111 Bernard Hopkins

 

Why do you always think about and talk about things like "Homosexual" and "****"?

And why is it "nice to know" that your boy friend is "****ing ugly"?

I think we have you figured out but-boy. :rofl

 

lol for real though

its funny that it wasnt really a big deal when hop said ill never lose to a white boy if joe would have said i wont never lose to a black men he would have been crucified we would have saw jesse jackson and al sharpton go to whales and hold rallys and all types of dumb ****

 

You are ****ing joke. Calzaghe did not land his jab all fight. It came up short whenever he threw it or it was countered or smothered by excessive holding. Even in his barrage of slaps he was not landing at all. Not one scoring blow. You need to explain this bull**** with proof. SHOW US THE ****ING ROUNDS AND LANDED PUNCHES.

 

BH fought very negatively and tried to steal the fight as opposed to winning it. He had to adhere to a strict gameplan just to remain as competitive as he did. Had he deviated from it - and allowed JC the chance to unload his usual fast-handed combo's - he would have lost by even bigger margins and may well have been overwhelmed in the late rounds. JC is one of the very few elite fighters that applies consistant pressure throughout the whole 12 rounds (that's physically AND mentally draining for anybody to deal with, especially a 43-year old man) and BH was more intent on stopping Joe from fighting his usual fight than throwing punches. Ask yourself who was more fearful of getting hit?..Who was more intent on spoiling the fight as a specticle for the fans?..Who was pressing the action and trying to make a fight out of it? Hopkins is a smart man and as shrewd as they come in a boxing ring and he knew that he could never match JC for speed, stamina and workrate, he also knew that if he fought a more aggressive fight it would play right into JC's hands as a busy counter puncher, so he just tried nullifiying JC's strengths and stealing the fight with a few flurries per round. That's why he lost. And anybody who thinks that BH's constant holding didn't have an effect on JC's ability to land more punches, needs to cut their wrists and donate their body to medical science(make sure not to donate your brain though, I'm not too sure what good that would be to aspiring doctors) Maybe farmers could use them for pig food? Actually, pigs are quite intelligent and would probably would turn their noses up at them in fear of contaminating the gene pool.

Hopkins is a great fighter, but so is Calzaghe. All you haters need to stop hating and looking for the negative and appreciate him for what he is.