Kessler's and Hopkins' dominating wins further elevate Joe Calzaghe's status

Because the judges beat Hopkins, not him and if he's that confident he can beat Hopkins, than he should take the rematch. He'll try to find some way to chump out and if he doesn't he'll probably try and buy the judges so he can insure a win.

 

If I'm not important, then get the **** off my nuts, *****. Because you sure keep acting like it. Feared? Opinion of myself? Are you this stupid and sophmoric? Why don't you tell me more of what you're thinking and how all this makes you feel, crbaby... Go ahead, keep crying. Make it obvious who's wearing the pants in the situation. You're laying out in explicit terms every pathetic detail. Oh, and keep trolling... And keep saying weak **** to make the Calzaghe nationalists look like ****ing morons. Keep it up. You'll notice most of them have respectfully bowed out. You, keep making a fool of yourself, idiot. Keep it up.

 

Are you serious?

 

hmmmmm.... i would like to see a kess-calz 2, but it will never happen i know, if it did kess would win for sure.....


hulter

 

Isn't there enough fishing spots for you in the northern beaches muttley?

 

Well Calzaghes boy Chuck Giampa saved him the last fight, what makes you think he won't hire him for the rematch.:roll:

 

Wow, you've really lost your cool

:| :| :| :| :|

'Calzaghe nationalists'?

You're really struggling, trying desperately to recruit because you can't handle the heat :yep

BTW, you still haven't refuted anything I posted about Hopkins' resume.

When are you going to turn your attention to the topic this thread is about, instead of throwing around the troll accusations and trying to use big words that you can't spell?

All bluster and no substance, that's what you are :yep

 

Our eyes. A resume is not the end-all-be-all. It is a means. It is a tool. Our eyes and our brains are what determines a fighter's greatness. Let me ask you; what determines your merit, your accomplishments, your achievements as a human being? As a friend? As a father? As a brother? As an artist? A piece of paper??? A piece of paper couldn't begin to tell even a fraction of the truth, even a fraction of the overall picture. A resume can be the truth - but it can also be a lie.

 

Have you ever actually learnt anything from firsthand experience, or do you just repeat dumb **** you see and hear?

 

Have a go of this ****ing mug, all mystical and **** - what the **** are you smoking?

This content is protected

"Man who go to bed with itchy bum wake up with smelly finger"

 

Heat? From what? You're a ****ing moron. Hopkins' resume? You want to talk about his resume?? You're mentally ******ed. Enough with this bull****, argue elsewhere, ****. You're too pathetic and stupid. I have no more time. No more interaction with me.

 

Nah, I just tell the obvious and the obvious was that Chuck Giampa didn't like Hopkins(remember, he cheated Hopkins in the Taylor fight as well) and the white boy comment gave him more reason to cheat him in the Calzaghe fight. Calzaghe is a chump and you know he's gonna try his best to back out of the rematch cause he knows he'll lose and deep down inside you know it too, that's why you asked me why should he give a rematch.

 

Yes Kessler's win yesterday over a future ATG Häussler simply cemented his legendary status, and 43 year old Hopkins never had acute stamina problems (against Calzaghe) brought about by old age - but mealy bad wind. :roll:

 

No, how about we talk about your claims that Hopkins would decide to hit Calzaghe if they rematched, because apparently he woke up one day after losing to Calzaghe and decided to fight aggressively, and this is why he was so impressive in beating Pavlik, and therefore would KO Calzaghe in a rematch in Wales

What a sToOPid ****ing idea to have - don't you feel sToOPid?

You should, because you're a ****ing idiot :yep