All props to Bernard Hopkins for his brilliant and age-defying victory over Kelly Pavlik! Now, having said that, remember Pavlik, at least in my opinion, was never a threat to beat Hopkins, with that guileless, straight ahead style of his. Guys like Jones, Taylor and Calzaghe, with skills, angles and jab and move techniques have shown they have the right ideas in coping with Bernard. A simplistic, walk-in type of slugger type will be Hopkin's meat and potatoes as we all know, so let's see what you guys would devise, strategywise if you were preparing your own fighter for challenging Hopkins. In my opinion, a classic jab and move stylist like a Willie Pastrano, with a purist's devotion to remaining on task, with a fanatical, almost religious dedication to avoid punishment like Pastano, and to use another stylistic example, Tommy Loughran. Pastrano, when "on" and in shape, like against Harold Johnson, had the required discipline to turn the tables on Johnson and refuse to lead, thus making Harold have to take the uncomfortable role of aggressor and do the leading in their 1963 15 rounder. This is the sort of strategy, even if it stinks out the crowd, that it would take IMO to outfox Bernard Hopkins, and not fall prey to lapsing and fighting the sort of fight that plays into Bernard's hands.
Interesting question Red...and I believe you just answered it for us. Not just any fighter could pull it off, but an excellent mover with a great left jab IMO gives Hopkins the hardest fight... mobility is the key.
Hopkins can be beaten, speed and a decent amont of power. I thought Calzage beat him close but clearly.....
Yeah, that's it...speed and mobility. The guys who have beaten Hopkins in recent years have shown it, but definetly not Pavlik. I didn't get too excited about Pavlik's chances from the get-go, like so many of his fans. A sraight ahead plodder like that, with no angles or cleverness. Another thought, would a swarmer, a high energy type of swarmer have a chance against Hopkins, in your opinion?
A swarmer would tend to lose, I think. He'd get timed timed timed on the way in, over and over again. It could be argued that a swarmer might win rounds on workrate and aggression, but judges seem to prefer clean hard punches these days - hard to see any swarmer scoring blows on Hopkins better than the ones he'd be giving back. A traditional Walker performance would be very, very interesting to see stacked agains Hopkins, but I pick Bernard.
basically copy exactly what dlh did for the first 6rounds, flurrys again and again and again, in and out with speed and power is the way to beat b-hop
An interesting thing is that basically a fighter with the same abilities - like mentioned: jab, fast feet and hand and a bit of power - would trouble both Hopkins versions either the younger, more athletic, more powerful and faster stalker version and the older, more experienced, craftier counterpuncher verstion. The thing is that you need these abilities but at a level that rarely occurres.
Hopkins struggles with a near mirror image of himself. You definitely need lateral movement and speed combined with a solid jab. Hopkins also doesn't like to lead off and be forced to become the aggressor over sustained periods of a fight. I'm talking a prime Hopkins. Not the aggressive one of the early-mid 90's. Chad Dawson is Hopkins' worst nightmare. I'll make a prediction now if they ever meet. Dawson W12. I'd be shocked if Hopkins pulled that one off.