Froch: "The Judge That Scored Hopkins Over Calzaghe Was Correct"

Round 10 was, if I remember, the round where Bernard hit the wall and pulled his academy award-worthy shinennigans to force a break in the action so he could have a rest.

(He fooled the ref once, but not a second time).

Without the little break, there likely wouldn't have been any round 11.

 

Bernard sometimes made that fight hard to score but more often made it easy to score.

115-112 Calzaghe.

 

That's being generous to Bernard.

I could give him one, two, three or four of the first four rounds.

(On fight night, I gave him two of those. Rewatching it, sometimes i've given him two rounds, sometimes, three.)

After that, Nada.

 

Hahaha... Sure. I don't give a **** about any of that. That's your agenda.

 

​

Son, them's the facts.

And they're not much in dispute.

Even Bernard tossed a wink towards the ref.


Now go look in the mirror.

That guy in there, he's the one with the agenda.

 

Smart guy, you think people can't see the trail of posts extolling the greateness and virtue of Joe Calzaghe you've left behind?? Cut the ****. You know goddamn well there is zero agenda here. This cute stuff with the "mirror" is highly amusing coming from a character like you. The FACTS have been laid out - and you won't touch them. Calzaghe LOST ROUND 10 (among others). Calzaghe DID NOT LAND NEARLY ENOUGH SCORING SHOTS TO WIN THIS FIGHT. Those are the facts, smart guy. Keep avoiding them and talking empty mess. That's safer..

 

Those are your OPINIONS.

The TRUTH is something you appear incapable of handling.




The facts:

American location.

American Ref

Three American judges.


Scores of 9-3, 8-4 and 6-6.

And a good majority of ESB respondents to the poll the following week said Calzaghe won.

Bernard Fans like Rummy (who wrote an article on the front predicting a BHop win) admitted defeat.

Bernard's most loyal fan (Sues 2nd) hoped for a BHop victory but, being a little more knowledgeable about the sport, admitted defeat.

Like I said, them's the facts.

That's the truth.

 

HUH?? What is this garble? ^ None of that has anything to do with the FACTS. NONE OF IT.

 

I thought Hopkins won. Calzaghe was playing pitty-pat and landed hardly any solid shots. Hopkins landed the telling blows and deserved to win that fight.

 

As there are at least seven incontravertible and indisputable facts contained in the post,
it is very clear what your problem is.

You don't know the meaning of the word 'fact'.

Stay in school.

It's your only hope !

 

That's enough mouth from somone who's clearly a ****ing idiot - **** off, lightweight. I have no time.

 

Indeed, but you won't see anyone claiming Calzaghe won try and challenge that.. Running for the hills when the conversation turns to the subject of scoring punches. LITERALLY EVERYTIME. They scurry like ****ing cockroaches.

 

Great response.

Well argued.


But I think the readers can make up their own minds as to who is the idiot.



When your ass gets owned this badly, you should probably have the doc check for rectal bleeding.

Till next time !
:hi:

 

Why are you guys bothering with the few deviats that are too biased to acknowledge their fighter lost?

Calzaghe clearly won, everyone knows it. Well - except these few 'cases'. Just ignore them - I doubt they are being serious.

 

That's it, cockroach.. Keep running under the refrigerator when the lights come on. Not only are you a shamelessly biased moron, you're also a ****ing idiot. Impressive... :dead That was some argument you had - thanks for letting me know that the fight was held in America, the scores, the national origin of the judges, and the fact that a couple of ESB posters thought Calzaghe won. I'm overwhelmed. Really. That was truly astounding.