Hey, the way this forum is, I wouldnt be surprised if someone seriously made a thread like this. I got Kessler by SD over Tyson
X and his love for mismatches, or mythical matchups with obvious winners. I can understand it if X hated Kessler, but he likes him, so I don't get this one.
kessler hasn't done **** and yet gets credit he gets more credit then joe c! ..which is simple proof that most fans are just in it to watch people get their brains beat in
Size alone makes this a no-brainer. THe fact that spinks was immensely skilled at 175 makes it more obvious.
I think what makes it the most obvious is the infamous "Jinx". Kessler would be flat on his back in under 6 rounds.
kessler against a guy who is considered by many the best at 175 lbs.? did kessler back up into your car or something?
The size difference isn't that large. It's a one weight division difference, and under different weigh-in rules. Spinks's height and reach advantages over Kessler aren't large either. It's a matter of Spinks being an ATG, one of the more adaptable fighters you'll see, and Kessler not proving to be on that level (nor does it appear that he has a style advantage to make up for this, either).