Pictures of Gerald Mclellan...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Aug 10, 2007.


  1. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Not crazy or bias (I am not British). I have studied that fight to a depth that you're simple mind could not possibly comprehend. The fight was competitive from the 2nd round onwards, Benn had little difficulty finding Gerald's head with his huge winging hooks.

    As I said several posts back, if McClellan was dominating in the manor in which you are implying, then the fight would not be considered the modern day seesaw classic that it is, ergo, you're bitter, twisted and full of ****. :)

    Let it go, your life will be easier, trust me.
     
  2. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Why do I need to acknowledge it at all? All I am merely doing is destroying your preposterous assertion that it was a one-sided affair and that Benn was not in the fight. He was not well on his way to winning the fight, that is revisionist history and utter nonsense. Prior to the knockdown in the 8th McClellan was DOWN on the scorecards. Benn had taken most, if not all, of the middle rounds, clearly you were still mesmerised by the beatdown that McClellan handed Benn in the first. You should watch this fight again and revise your woefully distorted opinions, I guarantee you that you’ve not seen that fight as many times as I have.

    Man… you’re not only contracting history but yourself too! How can, by your own admission, a brutal war where both men fought valiantly and showed tremendous heart be anything other than a seesaw classic? How can a fight where one man gets pummelled in the first, rally back to take the majority of the middle rounds, only to be bludgeoned to the canvas once more in the 8th and then come back and knock his man out in the 10th be anything other than a seesaw battle?!?!?!?

    Please accept my apologies for the grammatical error, English is not my primary or secondary language.
     
  3. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,674
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    you've just gone from one guys extreme to the other, mclellan was leading no doubt but to suggest he was 'destroying' benn is nuthugging of the highest order as well. benn certainly dished out his fair share of punishment as well, the second round is absolutely brutal when benn comes out like a bull and lands bomb after bomb on the g man.
     
  4. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Get an education before you address me you petulant little child. McClellan got beaten squarely and fairly by a better man, and that just burns you to the bone. :lol:

    Benn was taking those middle rounds against your over-hyped boy, the guy was too tough for him. He bobbed and weaved beneath McClellan’s assault and landed frequently and heavily on McClellan to take those rounds. Whilst McClellan was landing he was only landing with single shots, which Benn easily absorbed whilst continuing to push his man backwards.
     
  5. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  6. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,674
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    i'm not disputing the fact that the g-man was leading and probably should have gone on to win, but there is no doubt that once he tasted benns power in the second that he was not so keen to mix it up like he did in the first which allowed for a much closer fight than the one you seemed to be watching.
     
  7. Southy

    Southy New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    Jan 3, 2007
    Fact is Mclellan didnt get him out of there and couldnt, Sick *******s always get it in the end he got it and some.
    Benn=Warrior
    mclellan=**** human being
     
  8. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005
    Again, Fallow, your opinions on this fight constitute a great deal of wishful thinking.

    No one can dispute Benn's amazing, courageous performance. And in the second round, while it at least appears McClellan is OK, Benn was tagging him with huge shots.

    But you are simply wrong about the timing of Gerald's problems. He complained to his corner after the second round, but no one acted. And he started fighting with the mouthpiece out most likely because he was struggling already with his breathing.

    And certainly, by the time the 8th round rolls around, he is suffering tremendously. Still, he nearly takes Benn out. Do you recall how rubbery Nigel was at the end?

    He did land some clean shots on G-Man in the 10th, but Gerald didn't fall like a hurt fighter. He very calmly takes a knee and is blinking furiously by this point. I have the fight on my machine. Don't like to watch it very frequently, but it's must-see material if you're interested in either McClellan or Benn.
     
  9. Kolya

    Kolya Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,963
    42
    Jul 21, 2004
    Everyone who's ever fought Nigel Benn has said that he's a ridiculous puncher; isn't it possible, just maybe, that one of the shots he landed began McClellan's downfall? How about giving Nigel some credit here, people; no one gave him any chance and he came back from the brink to KO a heavily favored opponent. His going outside the ring doesn't matter; what matters is he got up from it.
     
  10. Ethan Trims

    Ethan Trims Active Member Full Member

    530
    1
    May 6, 2007
    This must be a nerd trying too hard to be intelligent for his own good. "Literary abomination" :lol: Keep trying little guy.

    Whatever, I'm not crying over him getting brain damage and barely anyone else is either. You one of the few. No law needs to punish him, it seems karma did the trick.

    We have already been through this. NO I DONT HOLD A DOGS LIFE IN THE SAME REGARD AS A PERSONS. but I DO HOLD AN ANIMALS LIFE IN A HIGHER REGARD THEN A PIECE OF **** HUMAN BEINGS. Try to understand that now.

    But they can feel pain just like humans, and most people on this earth outside of the asian culture have a close relationship with canines and dont like to see them abused especially by a rich wealthy person with who's seeking a sick gratification from that animal suffering.



    In person I wouldnt do that, I would just ***** slap you because thats what a ***** deserves and that what you are to me. Any more effort to humiliate you is wasted time and energy.

    You should choose your battles a little more carefully next time.
     
  11. Ethan Trims

    Ethan Trims Active Member Full Member

    530
    1
    May 6, 2007
    Nicely put.
     
  12. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005
    Tremendous overall post. I think I agree with it all. Whatever Gerald brought into the ring with him that night, his poor defense and Benn's aggression clearly played a role in the tragic outcome.

    I've isolated the part above for the same reason I asked Sweet Pea about this earlier. Where did you see this information? There's so much info out there about this fight, I just have stumbled across it yet.
     
  13. Ethan Trims

    Ethan Trims Active Member Full Member

    530
    1
    May 6, 2007
    Spousal abuse is a much more complex crime than animal cruelty. There are plenty of manipulative, evil, crazy women in this world who encourage and enjoy that sort of thing. I have known alot of women like this.

    Animal cruelty specifically torturing an animal is basically just to see an animal suffer. Pretty simple.

    Im not too familiar with the SRR situation, maybe him and his wife had a love/hate relationship. Maybe she was cheating on him and broke his heart. It certainly isnt isnt like going out of your way too buy a puppy at a pet shop then feeding it to your pitbulls.

    You know almost all serial killers start out with animal cruelty, so you see the kind of person that engages in this sort of thing.
     
  14. ELGALLO

    ELGALLO New Member Full Member

    40
    0
    Jan 29, 2007
    WE FOUND HIM!! HERE IS HUGHWEB....THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION "WHO IS THE MOST HUMAN BEING ALIVE?"
     
  15. ELGALLO

    ELGALLO New Member Full Member

    40
    0
    Jan 29, 2007
    U KNOW?