This content is protected This article describes Bob Fitzsimmons destruction of Gus Ruhlin. It is one of my favourite old time newspaper articled because it captures the mood at the time and the drama of the event. Oficialy Bob Fitzsimmons weighed 158 lbs and Gus Ruhlin claimed 195 but the writer suggests that Ruhlin understated his weight and he was actualy closer to 205 lbs. The writer seems to be genuinely shocked that Fitzsimmons not only overcame such a huge weight disparity but destroyed the much larger man in such a dramatic manner. This brings it home what it must have been like to witness such a destructive pound for pound fighter in the flesh. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Bob had unusually large hands for a Man his size. He possesed freakish power as well. I've read that he KOd a Man who weighed 300 Lbs. in 10 seconds. He dosn't get the credit he deserves as a Middleweight or Light Heavyweight.
What I find fascinating is the way people at the time were saying "he is too small to beat Ruhlin" or "he is too small to beat Dunkhorst". Sort of echoing what many people on this forum would say 100 years later when discusing fantasy matchups. Fitzsimmons was a fighter who operated outside the norms of boxing and we might never see his like again.
Cool as ****. Now, we kind of take for granted Fitz inflicting violence on such bigger men, "yeah, that's about right, outweiged by 50lbs, wins by KO", so it's nice to read something flavoured.
"Fitz retired to the tub where he was bathed and steamed by Dan Hickey and George Dawson" WTF, maybe a bit to much flavour there.
I remember seeing a review to the effect that Bob would have to be better if he hoped to beat Sailor Sharkey. (Bob KO2'd Sharkey a few weeks later). I'd always woundered about Ruhlin 195 for this fight, as I'd thought he was a tad bigger than that.
For whatever reason, I think all of these guys underreported their weights. Back then, you did not need to weigh in officially for a heavyweight bout, because your weight didn't matter. Thus, most of the time these guys self reported. Fitz was probably about 170. Ruhlin was probably around 200. But we can't know for sure. My Jeffries book will come out early 2009, and will have discussions and descriptions of meaningful fights from Jeff's era, including Fitz-Ruhlin, Sharkey II, and other Fitz bouts, as well as Corbett-Sharkey II, McCoy, etc. Stay tuned.
Thanks. I've done Sullivan, Corbett, and Fitz. I'm editing Jeff right now. It's a doosy. It will likely be even longer than the others, and have more photos.
I remember some pictures of Fitz from a fight he had with Jeffries. Fitz, at least in his upper body, did not really look as thin as one might expect next to the more massive Jeffries, who was perhaps 50 or more pounds heavier than Fitz. Some say Fitz was a heavy from the waist up and a middle below the waist.
Fitz's pure physical abilitily was clearly off the chart! On nearly every great sports figure you can find some bits of information that indicates perhaps this iconic person's ability was overstated, not so with Bob Fitzsimmons and he fought on two continents.