it is well laid out but if u watch boxing how is pac not #1 LAST WEEK IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE...NOW odh IS A BUM...margarito!!!!! he had a good fight..he is not the best fighter of the year...not close to pacman
A bit strange you would rate Paul Williams so low when he stopped 3 guys in 3 weight classes. So you thought Bernard beat Joe by winning the first few rounds then hugging him the rest of the night?
Quite simple...as I already stated: Two dominating KO performances over prime and hungry top-5 WW belt holders in Cintron and Cotto, with Cotto being in the top-5 p4p at the time. Let's not pretend that De La Hoya was anywhere near the fighter he was when he fought Mayorga, let alone the fighter that fought Vargas, and forget about the De La Hoya that fought Trinidad. DLH was shot, just Freddie Roach said, still it was a GREAT performance by Pacman, similar to Larry Holmes great performance over Ali, but like that fight, the victory lacks the full luster due to both fighters being well past their prime. I give Manny much more credit for his controversial win (even though I had JMM winning a close fight) over Marquez than the victory over DLH, because Marquez was ranked in the top-10 p4p at the time and still in his prime. That's just my take, though many obviously differ. That fight determines his greatness for in my eyes as I consider JMM the baddest dude of Barrera and Morales trifecta. That's why I think Pacman is a special fighter, not for beating. Same reason I give props to Calzaghe, not necessarily for his fights against Hopkins (which I htough he lost) or RJJ (who was shot), but for his victories over lacy and especially Kessler, two undefeated badasses (at the time in Lacy's case). Kessler is still a badass and will continue to become a bigger badass in years to come IMO. When a fighter beats a young, prime, HUNGRY champion: I give that much more credit than a victory over an aging lion that has seen much better days.
Top-15 p4p isn't low, just think the guys I have before him have done better. I give him very little credit for beating a club fighter in Kolle, decent credit for beating a 39 yr old Phillips (who shouldn't of gotten the decision against Spinks), and good credit for stopping Quintana (though this was hard to gauge as he just caught Quintana cold, but was thoroughly dominated in the first fight, which is why a trilogy is a must). As for Hopkins, I had him winning the early rounds and landing the harder and cleaner punches throughout the fight. I prefer his clean shots to Calzaghe's slaps and had him winning a very close fight that many in press row (plus a judge) agreed with, though I have NO problems with Calzaghe getting the decision, just thought Hopkins won. It was a close and controversial fight.
Nice entry to the thread. So am I the piece of crap being poured on your chest like a Cleveland Steamer or better yet, the nuggety chocolate bukkake on your face you love so much? Your a scat man, right?
I think Hopkins had a better year than both in all honesty. If you look at their accomplishments closely and compare we have the following: Pacquiao: Controversial win against Marquez, great win against a weak title holder at 135lbs, and an unexpected win against De La Hoya (who couldn't pull the trigger just as Roach said) Calzaghe: Controversial win over Hopkins, convincing win over a past his best Jones whilst trying to do it in 'style'. I do give credit for this win though - Jones is still dangerous even if he's nothing like the prime version. Hopkins: Controversial loss to Calzaghe, utter domination of Pavlik who most deemed as an impossible outcome. I think here the determining factor is the manner of the win against Pavlik for Hopkins. No-one gave him a chance and he completely outboxed Pavlik from the first round to the very last - and Pavlik was trying his best but could do nothing. Oscar on the other hand just looked totally spent, drained and so on. I'm not discrediting Pacquiao, but my eyes tell me the Hopkins win was a far better achievement. Hopkins would be my fighter of the year. I'm also a big Calzaghe fan before anyone calls me a Hopkins nuthugger or anything!!
fighter of the year is pac also with the performance of the year in his fight with oscar. pac's fight against marquez is much better than hopkins fight against calzaghe. hopkins just fizzled in there against calzaghe's workrate and want to quit at some time. not to mention pac has the SD victory while hopkins got a SD loss. margarito could be a candidate for the fighter of the year but he didn't fight again after the tremendous victory over cotto. darchinyan has an awesome year also. but pac's demolition of oscar sealed it for him. 3 opponents in 3 different weight classes. 2 championship belts. i would be surprised if pacquiao would not get it.