Was Holyfield vs Bowe I an example of ...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Aug 14, 2007.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    A good big man beating a good smaller man?

    The commentators, including the experienced Larry Merchant, thought so.

    Now i'm not saying Holyfield couldn't beat Bowe because of the size difference. It was clear that Holyfield consistently got the better of Bowe from the outside, jabbing, during the first round of their first fight, during most of the second fight (which is how he won) and during the first three or so rounds of their third match.

    What i noticed in Bowe-Holyfield I is that Holyfield outlanded and outboxed Bowe early. Then he got lured into a close-range brawl and he was still landing far more than Bowe. However, as soon as the 4th or 5th round, it was painfully evident that Holyfield was much more tired and busted while Bowe was relatively fresh, despite the fact that Holyfield outlanded him by quite a margin. Seeing that fight, i tend to think Holyfield was simply too small to brawl with Bowe despite Holyfields great chin.
     
  2. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    I agree.....

    I'm not one to say that a good big man always beats a good small man but this was clearly a case of it. Evander's inability to overcome Riddicks size and strength was a major factor although I should add much of it had to with Riddicks ability
     
  3. jackiebrown

    jackiebrown Member Full Member

    498
    2
    Jul 13, 2007
    it didnt hurt bowe that holy didnt have the fire power to dent him either ..
     
  4. NickHudson

    NickHudson Active Member Full Member

    894
    21
    Apr 13, 2007
    I also agree, and I think Bowe Holy I would be the result for poor old Evander versus many 'natural' gifted heavies...

    If your opponent is talented and determined, but has the natural frame and musculature of a heavy (but you are not) then you are bound to be pushing **** uphill. It is a measure of Evan Fields determination coupled with some unmotivated opposition that lead to some of his success, IMO.

    His signature wins (Dokes, Bowe II, Tyson I, Lewis II (?)) required a huge amount of drive, a very well thought out gameplan, bags of heart AND an opponent who was a bit off - and even then they were close calls).
     
  5. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    57
    Jul 20, 2004
    I think "too small" is an oversimplification. He was smaller, and he didn't really have the punch or stamina(as a heavyweight) to break down Bowe in a slugfest. Holyfield had great 15-round stamina in his cruiserweight days, but after gaining all that body-builder-like and possibly steroid-induced muscle to get up past 205, he never had that kind of endurance again. He also didn't have quite enough pop to really be a monstrous threat at heavyweight.

    In other words, Holyfield's combination of a lack of top size, power and stamina at heavyweight led to his failure to prevail against Bowe in a slugfest, not just the first one. A small man with more long-term endurance and a bigger punch could have outslugged Bowe, in my opinion.
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Disagree.

    Especially on the stamina part.
    Holyfield had no problem throwing a lot of punches over 12 rounds against Dokes, Thomas, old Holmes & Foreman. He busted them all up with no signs of stamina problems. Against Bowe he was tired as early as round 5 while his conditioning was as good as identical as against the former mentioned.

    There was absolutely nothing wrong with Holyfield's conditioning going into the first Bowe fight. You make a good point about Holyfield lacking power but Bowe wasn't really a power puncher either, more a wear you down guy.


    When he gained even more muscle later, his stamina did seem to suffer quite a bit, although he did seem to add a bit more power.


    By the way - which smaller man do you think could've outslugged Bowe? Dempsey, Frazier?
     
  7. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Tyson would outslug Bowe fairly easily. Frazier and Dempsey could of as well.
     
  8. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Agreed on Tyson, although he was naturally around 215lb, Holyfield had to bulk up to 205lb.
     
  9. Hitman

    Hitman Member Full Member

    248
    6
    Aug 22, 2006
    I was worried about that fight for Holy going in ,because I had just watched Holyfield on Arsenio Hall a few weeks before the fight and bragging that he would stop Bowe in 6. Now ...I don't know about you guys...but it shocked me how overconfident bordering on arragants Evander was...it put up red flag with me right away and made think about what kind of time he put in the gym. It was so out of charactor to see Holy act that way before a fight because he wasn't the type of fighter to brag before fights. I soon learned right after that , that Bowe was his sparring partner yrs before and that Holy usually controlled Bowe during sparring sessions.The rest was history and it was evident that Holy totally miscalculated Bowe from the outset and that even Duva,Benten and others in Holy's camp had problems getting him into the gym for that fight. I still feel that if Holy prepared properly for that fight ...he would have took care of Bowe in a fight for the ages.
     
  10. bigG

    bigG Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    18
    Dec 8, 2006
    holyfields game plan of hit and move went out the window as soon as he got tagged..then it became a fight that suited the bigger, brawling, infighting style of bowe as vandrs heart and stubborness drew him into a brawl ....one of the finest h/w fights you will ever see..in fact, as a trilogy, pretty hard to beat...
     
  11. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    55
    Feb 26, 2007
    I'm not so sure that I would consider Evander Holyfield underpowered. He did manage to hurt George Foreman badly on a few occasions during their fight, and he dropped and seriously hurt Riddick Bowe in their third fight. I wouldn't consider Evander a great puncher, but I think he hit harder than alot of heavyweights.
     
  12. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    57
    Jul 20, 2004
    No, actually, watch again- Holyfield is dead tired in the late rounds of most of these fights, although his heart sometimes masks it. For example, watch late in the 12th round against Foreman- Holyfield is heaving for breath at times and at one point late in the round he grabs hold of Foreman and refuses to let go for several seconds despite the ref's repeated attempts to separate them(not an exaggeration- watch the film). This is a far cry from the Holyfield who fought an action-packed 15 rounds without slowing down against Qawi. Holyfield still had GOOD stamina in his early heavyweight fights, but he definitely no longer had GREAT stamina. It was better than your average contender's, but clearly worse than someone like Jeffries, Marciano or Frazier's, or even Ali or Holmes'.

    Nothing wrong with his conditioning in that he had trained hard like he always did, but again, when you gain 20 pounds of muscle mass, it weighs down on you. Why do you think the greatest long-distance endurance fighters, the guys who could fight an unusually fast pace for 15 rounds without taking a break(Marciano, Armstrong, Greb, Frazier), were all of the lighter-and-wirier as opposed to bulky-muscular variety? Holyfield used to be able to fight like that, when he was built more like those guys, but the added muscle mass was a hindrance to his endurance and it was never the way it had been against Qawi again.

    Bowe wasn't what you'd call a monstrous puncher, but he was only a tier or so below that level, definitely more of a power puncher than Holyfield. Moreover, this is a little beside the point- it wasn't about Bowe and Holyfield's respective punching power, but whether a smaller guy who had more power than Holyfield could have outslugged Bowe. Holyfield had Bowe hurt badly at least once or twice and had him down and nearly out in the third fight, so I don't think the prospects of such an idea are too bad.


    Both of those guys, Marciano, and possibly someone like a Tom Sharkey or Langford.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005

    So in fact you do think Holyfield was too small. Because you think the bulking up hurt his stamina too much, i.e. he should've been naturally that big so as to retain stamina at that weight.

    And yes, of course he was tired at the end of the Foreman fight; who wants to end a fight while still having gas in the tank, that would be a waste. On top of that, Foreman was a huge 6'4 259 pound man. While he didn't apply that much pressure because of age, it's still tiring to pound an immovable object. Nethertheless, stamina did not become a limiting factor on Holyfield as he thoroughly dominated Foreman (and Thomas, Dokes and Holmes for that matter).


    And you say Holyfield lacked the power.

    But what if the Holyfield from the Qawi fight shows up - yes he has better stamina, but his power is even less than the 205lb version. I see Bowe simply walking through whatever Holyfield has to offer even easier than he did in reality. On top of that, Holyfield would have a full 50lb to give up; that definitly drains energy.

    It's easy to fight hard for 15 rounds and throw many punches against someone who is 5'9 187lb. Yes he could do that at that weight. But i think it's naive to think he could simply do the same when having a 50 pound weight disadvantage. If you've ever boxed yourself then you will have noted that one of the most difficult things about fighting bigger guys is saving your energy. The fact that you have to spend so much time on getting in and out, defense, the easiness by which you are pushed around, the heavyness of even shots that you block, etc. I think a 188lb Holyfield would've lost even more decisive because he would be busted up worse, able to take the punches less well and not able to faze Bowe at all.



    I could see Frazier busting Bowe up late but it would be very hard considering Bowe's excellent infighting skills and size. I wouldn't consider a Bowe win a big upset.

    Dempsey and Marciano, they never fought someone as big and skilled as Bowe. Would their stamina hold up when they're facing a 6'5 235lb man who throws 50-60 punches a round?

    Willard was hopelessly skillless, a white hope who dethroned a fat, old and unfocused Johnson not on boxing skill but because he could take the punishement and not tire as much, a bit like Holyfield vs Bowe although Johnson's age had a lot to do with it. He was 37 and overweight against Dempsey.

    Sharkey and Langford i've not seen decent film on so i cannot judge that.
     
  14. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    I do think the extra 10 pounds he stuck on after Bowe I directly improved his power, which came as a nasty surprise to Bowe in their other two fights. Personally I've always felt that the '93 Holyfield of Bowe II was his peak as a heavyweight.
     
  15. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,056
    Oct 25, 2006
    This is an interesting thread.

    I'm going on memory here, so please forgive any mistakes...

    Holy initially weighed 202 for his heavyweight debut, and won the title at 208.
    He pretty much stayed at 208 except for the Bowe fight, where he was 205. I remember it being said that Holyfield came in slightly lighter in an effort to outspeed Bowe.
    The plan fell to pieces when Holyfield neglected the gameplan and brawled. As with everyone else, I noticed Evander had a serious problem putting the hurt on Bowe, who basically ground Holyfield down.
    Basically, the difference in power was the big decider in the fight.

    On the face of it, one could logically assume a good big man just beat a good little man. Had they never fought again, I would have continued to believe that.

    However, in the rematch Evander had Bowe hurt on several occasions. In that fight Holyfield weighed 214. That's an additional 9 lbs of muscle, but should only 9 lbs. have made that big a difference to Evander's ability to hurt Bowe? (Who incidentally was 11 lbs. heavier himself)
    I'm not so sure...

    I'm not saying that size had nothing to do with the result in Bowe-Holy 1, but I tend to think other factors, in addition to the size issue, led to Evander's eventual downfall here. Maybe he slightly overtrained to come in lighter than normal?

    Holyfield was always a very chiseled athlete who carried minimal bodyfat. In a fast-paced action bout like their first fight, he was probably burning muscle for energy as opposed to bodyfat. That would have a big impact on stamina and overall recovery.