bible of boxing.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by pinoy2k7, Dec 7, 2008.


  1. pinoy2k7

    pinoy2k7 Member Full Member

    348
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    east siders who would you consider a five tool boxer. Which means they had chin, power, defense, boxing ability, and speed. For me i would say Ricardo Lopez maybe even JMM with much less emphasis on power.
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
  3. FromWithin

    FromWithin Living for the city Full Member

    2,538
    0
    Feb 22, 2008
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    I wouldn't say Duran. He certainly never had pure boxing ability. Thats unfair slightly as that wasn't his style. It's like saying Hearns wasn't a great inside fighter. However, Duran was a very well rounded fighter.

    Duran was very good at long range against Leonard, although mainly when he stepped inside with his punches from long range and countered over Leonard's jabs, etc. He wasn't what I'd term a sustained 'scoring puncher' at long range. Scoring meaning looking to land punches without much power behind them. He fought on the outside against Hagler, jabbing ocassionally, with his countering right hand being his most authoritive weapon.

    Some people on here might try to convince me that Duran was very strong in all areas, nope. He was very strong in some areas of his game, and moderate in others.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,534
    28,770
    Jun 2, 2006
    Carlos Ortiz & Jose Napoles
     
  6. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,558
    Dec 18, 2004
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    good call

    what about joe louis
     
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Ray Robinson certainly scores strongly in all those areas. Some others were better defensively, also inside, but he was very good across the board.
     
  9. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,910
    811
    Nov 23, 2007
    Salvador Sanchez
     
  10. pinoy2k7

    pinoy2k7 Member Full Member

    348
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    definetly SRR and salvador sanchez they had everything
     
  11. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    415
    Sep 25, 2005
    Gpater, Louis is out in this one as his chin wasn't A-class. Charley Burley might be a good name here along with Mcveys Ortiz and Napoles picks. Ezzard Charles before the tragedy in the ring happened might also be a good addition.
     
  12. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    I think Sanchez lacked serious power. Well rounded though, yes.

    It's hard to come up with a fighter who was truely strong on all the areas mentioned.
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,448
    43,593
    Apr 27, 2005
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Leonard was strong across the board. Add intelligence into the mix as well, and it just makes him look even better.