please excuse my lack of brevity... 1. carl slags joe for three years. during this time joe beats lacy, bika, manfredo, kessler, hopkins and jones jr. carl beats ...*. joe responds with silly abuse and is the villain? 2. carl calls joe out repeatedly. carl wins a title and calls joe out ... but not at 175. eh!? weight to suit carl? 3. carl says joe (37) should not have fought roy (39) but fought him (31). 3a. carl says roy was shot. SHOT! robin reid was shot when he fought lacy. by the time he fought carl the sanctioning body should have been shot! 4. carl says the biggest fight for him is kelly not joe. that is the same kelly who got schooled (hate that word) by bernard, who lost to ... weight to suit carl? 5. went on well known site for boxers records and pascal ranked in the 20+ with manfredo and friends. 6. anyone who thinks carl will make three successful defences of his title please meet me on betfair.
hey the funniest thing is froch saying after how RJJ was old blah blah. But i remember before video footage of him basically saying how RJJ could beat him and its very intriguing and how he wouldnt be suprised if joe lost. looooooool. typical yank behaviour- they were nearly all saying the same same as just about every time including pacquiao etc. saying that im not slagging off RJJ- hes one of my fav fighters. A joy to watch
Calzaghe doesn't really destroy anyone. Not even a punching bag like Lacy. But Calzaghe would UD Carl, yes.
