Should Joe go for 50-0?

Kessler. He'd give hell all over again and can do better next time around.

The only Dawson fight I saw was the Tarver fight so I can't speak on him much.

 

50-0 is worth all the risk IMO especially after all the hell he is catching. He's not helping his own case too by running his mouth about how boxing is in a bad place and what not. 50-0 and he could win over many including me.

 

What legacy :rofl??

 

he definitely should. that's 4 more opportunities for him to finally lose a fight.

 

I will give you the top 3 p4p achievement but the rest are slightly over egged.

21 defences most of which were tomato cans are ex world champs coming of defeats (Reid, Brewer, Woodhall and Mitchell). Best opponents were tainted wins e.g. Eubank and RJJ shot, BHOP old etc but Kessler was a good win.

He was never a two weight world champion. He never won a belt at LH. The Ring is just a magazine.

Making a ton of money does not give the greatest boxing legacy it is about being brave and fighting elite fighters in thier prime oversease if needed.

 

Hopkins wins rounds but not enough just like in both Taylor fights.

Kessler, Johnson, Hopkins and Dawson would be fine with me. Who else is there really.

 

I have been watching JC for years and I know he is past his best so I dont see the point in JC possibly losing to young fighter if their victories will always be tainted by that.

I prefer that JC just retired or went to MMA.