P4P according to Ring Magazine 1. Phillippines 2. Mexico 3. GB 4. US 5. Mexico 6. Mexico 7. Mexico 8. Puerto Rico 9. Puerto Rico 10. GB That's definitely a win for Mexico in my eyes. Supported by highest rated per weight HW - UKR CW - POL LHW - GB SMW - DEN MW - USA LMW - USA (I reckon should be UKR) WW - MEX LWW - PHL (Tough but fair on Ricky) LW - MEX SFW - VEN (maybe SAF?) FW - IDN SBW - MEX BW - JPN SFL - ARM FLW - PHL LFL - PUE STW - NIC For the US, without Floyd Jr, you're really down to BHop, Chad, Kelly and Paul Williams. Come back PBF....
Mexico definitely produces a lot more quality boxers than most nations. Whether they are p4p great or not depends on a cycle I suppose. Although I do agree that Puerto Rico produces a ridiculous amount of good fighters given their population.
Different countries do well at different weights. Mexico does well but looks better than it is for them because they do so well at the smaller weights.
The weights aren't so far apart (although I suppose more people fight at them). It makes them look as though they're boxers are better technically and that what they are good at doing works across a wider spectrum of weights when it actually works better at the smaller rather than the bigger weights.
how can you not have the wickster an no.1 LWW? in my eyes GB deserve their place as we've got the recognised no.1 at LWW (Hatton) SMW/LH (calzaghe) and cruiser (HAYE)