Outrageous Robbery of Holyfield

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Zakman, Dec 20, 2008.


  1. Kojiro

    Kojiro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,633
    0
    Nov 11, 2004
    7-5 Holyfield at least!
     
  2. bronze_bandit

    bronze_bandit Active Member Full Member

    1,059
    15
    Jul 17, 2008
    These judges should be placed on trial....
    results like this make you question the game, no wonder pple are going elsewhere and not watching boxing!!?
     
  3. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Michael Buffer looked like he was thinking that when he gets home he is going to cry in the shower and scrub himself until he is "clean" when he was coaxing the crowd into an applause.
     
  4. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006
    I had Valuev winning 4 rounds - AT THE MOST.

    Just a terrible robbery - I can't believe this decision. Actually I CAN believe it, I just hate the thought of fixed fights still being involved in modern boxing, but obviously it's still here.
     
  5. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,770
    2,959
    Apr 16, 2005
    That's exactly the score I had it for HOLYFIELD. And I thought I was being generous to Valuev. :lol:
     
  6. tonsetzer

    tonsetzer ! Full Member

    656
    0
    Apr 18, 2008
    Holyfield deserves to get the decision just because Valuev was so unbelievable schit. A world champion waiting for a 46 year old to slow down, what a joke. If you see it round for round, it was a close fight. I dont see it at as a big robbery. it was very controversial, at our german board it was like 50:50 who won. But all agreed that Valuev sucks big time.
     
  7. lobitopp

    lobitopp Member Full Member

    146
    0
    Apr 19, 2008
    You don't win belts by running and jabbing... Valuev was the champ so the old man did nothing to win, stop crying.
     
  8. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    Yep, me too...I had it for Holyfield. What a sad decision.
     
  9. Nico

    Nico hi. Full Member

    950
    1
    Aug 17, 2005

    What an awful scorecard.

    The fight could have gone either way? Yeah, I guess Hopkins- Pavlik could have gone either way too. Holyfield was robbed, plain and simple. Valuev did absolutely nothing.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    you should be shot for comparing Holyfield's performance today with Hopkins' performance against Pavlik.
     
  11. Olander

    Olander Active Member Full Member

    660
    1
    Jan 19, 2005
    I didn't see the fight, but the Sports Illustrated boxing guy scored it 118-110 for Holyfield. And his comments made it seem like he was generous to give Valuev ANY rounds.

    I'll have to watch the fight to see for myself. But this decision stinks of the typical European home town corrupt judging.
     
  12. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,422
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    ESPN: Denied Again - Holyfield, left, found it difficult to close the distance on Valuev

    FN: Fightnews saw it as 115-113 for the reigning champion. All in all, not the best day for Valuev despite his milestone 50th pro victory, a bitter setback for the 46-year-old Holyfield.

    What the **** they were watching? :think
     
  13. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    Doesn't the WBA not allow 10-10 roudns in championship fights?
     
  14. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    It's a disgrace of a fight whoever won.
     
  15. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    No way in hell would Lennox be pleased by this blight on boxing.