How does beating Enzo make him undisputed? He had the WBC and WBA titles but he never had the IBF. I'm a Haye fan but he needs to stop talking crap. He was never the undisputed champion.
He was the lineal champ, he was the Ring champ, he had just about as much alphabet gold as a man can carry, he was the champ of that division. No one gave a wank about Cunningham or that pole with the long name and their crappy IBF belt.
Westwood is a ****. Haye was the main man at 200. Now it's up to his opponents to help build his legacy i.e. Frag is now WBC champ. It would be good for Haye if Enzo reclaims the WBO.
Its quite a grey area, but I thought you become Undisputed in one of two ways, unify 3 major belts, or beat an undisputed Champion. Bell was undisputed, lost to Mormeck, who lost to Haye. Anyways, he was far and away the number 1 guy there.
Linear champion Bell never lost the IBF title in the ring, not that the ibf was relevent anyway. Haye even picked up Enzo's paper wbo title. Haye was without a doubt the undisputed champ.
Ali had it. Hemad didn't have it. If you put Hamed into the mix then the level becomes low enough for many to be in there. Then a Toney can be in there. Toney belongs with a Hamed, but not with Ali - and to soem degree (need to see more) with Haye. Haye is for sure a rare clever fighter.
I ****ing despise that **** westwood....Is'nt he a vicars son or something..?? Not a fan but I'm starting to warm a bit toward Haye...