Which type of win is the most dominating?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TheFlyingMan, Jan 10, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. TheFlyingMan

    TheFlyingMan Keyboard Warrior No More Full Member

    44
    0
    May 2, 2005
    Would love to hear what you guys think. It's easy to say "early KO", but one can argue that an early KO is a fluke. Or the guy "got caught", or he was a better boxer but the other fighter just had more power.

    On the other hand beating someone on points over 12 rounds but not getting any KO might seem dominating to some (I'm thinking of Ali in that fight someone described as a child pulling the wings of a fly or something - was it Patterson?). So I just wanted to see what the majority view is.

    *edit: OK did some research. It was Patterson, but the fight was stopped in the 12th round.
    From the website I found:
    "About the champ's second title defense, The Times' Robert Lipsyte writes: "Like a little boy pulling off the wings of a butterfly piecemeal, Cassius Clay mocked and humiliated and punished Floyd Patterson for almost 12 rounds tonight until the referee halted their heavyweight championship bout because the challenger was 'outclassed.'" "

    Assuming a 12 rounder:
    A) KO / TKO in first round
    B) winning all rounds en route to an early KO (e.g. round 4)
    C) winning all rounds en route to a mid-late KO (e.g. round 10)
    D) winning all rounds but no KO
     
    TheFlyingMan, Jan 10, 2009
    TheFlyingMan, Jan 10, 2009
    #1
  2. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Definetly winning all the rounds up to an early KO in the 4/5th.

    Tyson vs. Bruno I, comes to mind.
     
    El Cepillo, Jan 10, 2009
    El Cepillo, Jan 10, 2009
    #2
  3. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    Pbf gatti
     
    pauliemayweathe, Jan 10, 2009
    pauliemayweathe, Jan 10, 2009
    #3
  4. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Winning all rounds to an early KO.

    1st round KOs are massively overrated in terms of how good/bad a fighter is.
     
    ApatheticLeader, Jan 10, 2009
    ApatheticLeader, Jan 10, 2009
    #4
  5. sir axeman

    sir axeman Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,307
    159
    Jun 24, 2007
    Lewis V Tua...and even better Calzahge v Lacey - they were 12 punishing rounds were Lacey always had a "hope" but really was just humiliated and shown up for the whole fight. The opponent probs would like to go the distance but maybe after its over may have wished not the day after as they're usually very sore all over after being punished over 12 long rounds.

    In terms of health risks I guess a 1st round KO is probs less damaging than being battered for 12 rounds.

    In terms of damage mentally to a fighter being whupped every round of a fight destroys your confidence...a quick KO loss you can tell yourself that you got caught cold and maybe next time you'd take it better...a total ass whoopin would leave you with what?
     
    sir axeman, Jan 10, 2009
    sir axeman, Jan 10, 2009
    #5
  6. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007
    Winning every round and then finishing it off with a ko.
     
    KCD, Jan 10, 2009
    KCD, Jan 10, 2009
    #6
  7. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Getting dominated in the "sweet science" and being completely outclassed is most impressive to me. Examples like Winky/Tito, Hopkins/Pavlik, Calzaghe/Lacy. Guys that were so much better and superior than their opponent that the can play around in the ring.
     
    klion22, Jan 10, 2009
    klion22, Jan 10, 2009
    #7
  8. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007

    Yeh but why fight Margarito when you can fight Gatti..........:good
     
    KCD, Jan 10, 2009
    KCD, Jan 10, 2009
    #8
  9. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    I would say that a late stoppage after sweeping the cards is the most dominating usually. There are a few exceptions - Tyson v Spinks being one, that was pure short term domination.
     
    MattMattMatt, Jan 10, 2009
    MattMattMatt, Jan 10, 2009
    #9
  10. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Gatti vs Gamache.
     
    catasyou, Jan 10, 2009
    catasyou, Jan 10, 2009
    #10
  11. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Oh, i didn't realize that there was an option for dominating for most of the fight then winning via KO late. That would be my choice.
     
    klion22, Jan 10, 2009
    klion22, Jan 10, 2009
    #11
  12. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    I like a domination on way to a late stoppage.

    It depends on the opponent though. If its a lesser opponent its better to stop him early, otherwise question marks against your power.

    Against a quality operator, if you dominate all rounds and KO him late that shows everything to me. Great boxing ability, stamina, concentration and finally the power.
     
    TFFP, Jan 10, 2009
    TFFP, Jan 10, 2009
    #12
  13. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    37,047
    12,000
    Jan 6, 2007


    Yes.

    A lengthy lesson is dished out and then a stoppage caps it all and puts the exclamation point on it.
     
    cuchulain, Jan 10, 2009
    cuchulain, Jan 10, 2009
    #13
  14. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    It really depends on the manner in which the rds are won, each fight is different.
     
    Bill Butcher, Jan 10, 2009
    Bill Butcher, Jan 10, 2009
    #14
  15. TheFlyingMan

    TheFlyingMan Keyboard Warrior No More Full Member

    44
    0
    May 2, 2005
    Thanks guys, great discussion!
     
    TheFlyingMan, Jan 11, 2009
    TheFlyingMan, Jan 11, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2