Prosecutor Cahpelle injected Cotto yesterday of which she knew it had no relavence to this specific case, yet was she setting a precedent? Has she been alerted to some evidence and is privy to something damaging to Margie which could send him to the state resort? Source below with link...please read. During yesterday’s proceedings, deputy attorney general Karen Chapelle, working for the prosecution, tried to raise the issue of Margarito’s fight with Miguel Cotto last July as evidence in the case, saying that Margarito also had loaded his gloves when he faced Cotto and gotten away with it. Predictably, the Commission refused to hear anything regarding the Cotto fight, because it took place in Las Vegas, out of their jurisdiction. For their purposes, whether Margarito did or did not load his wraps against Cotto has no bearing on what transpired prior to the Mosley fight. But for an outside observer, not to mention Miguel Cotto himself, that question has enormous significance for the larger issue at stake here. Margarito and his trainer received a year suspension from the CSAC for what amounts to an attempt to cheat, or if you want to be plain about it, an attempt to commit assault with a deadly weapon. But if Margarito’s wraps were loaded in the Cotto fight, then the word “attempt” is out of the equation. As all boxing fans will vividly recall, he beat Cotto to a bloody pulp that night. One has to wonder why Karen Chapelle even would bother to bring up the Cotto issue yesterday when she knew as well as anyone that it would not be admissible in a California hearing. Is it possible that she has evidence that Margarito wore loaded wraps in the Cotto fight, and alluded to it merely to indicate as much to the world at large? Because, to my mind, merely the fact that the Margarito/Cotto bout was raised yesterday as a precedent by the prosecution, along with the ultimate verdict in the case, leads me to believe that Cotto now has the right to demand a hearing into the matter by the Nevada State Athletic Commission, such that whatever it is that Karen Chapelle or anyone else knows about the issue can be heard and judged in the proper jurisdiction. In the end, this is the very ugly fact of the matter: A California deputy attorney general yesterday inferred that Margarito’s wraps were loaded when he fought Miguel Cotto, and it seems highly improbable that she would do so without holding some legitimate proof of that accusation. If she has that proof, if what she said is true, then Antonio Margarito deserves to go to jail. Should you think I’m being an alarmist and overstating the case, you might want to refer to the sad, horrible tale of This content is protected and This content is protected . http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/th...17186/is_jail_time_next_for_antonio_margarito What do you guys think? it just seems very, very interesting...she wants to jail him....I think she knows something.
Thats my point....I think Capetillo is going to do some jail time...and Margie may very well accompany him. This is some serious stuff.
hmm very strange indeed why would someone with a senior rank like her bring that up? its completely irrelvant to the subject at hand. i will keep a close eye on this one
she might very well have evidence or know something that the public does not know of.why else would she bring that up.i think theres alot more to this than what we saw yesterday.peeeaaaaccccccceeeee:think
I think if she had solid proof Margarito would be in jail today, She is only speculating as far as I can tell
I tend to agree... but at the same token...it also appears as if she allowed something she knew much about but wasn't supposed to speak to slip out... I guess we'll find out on the very next episode of Days of Our Lives: Margarito Edition
All speculation at this point. Hopefully the CA Department of justice does their job, leaves no stone unturned, and the Feds. (John McCain) keep a close eye on this. There could be massive **** coming out in March. Pure speculation on my part, but names that we are not even thinking about @ this point may be snared up in this mess. I have no proof, just @ thought @ this point.
prosecutors are known to do this kind of thing. they bring up any and all bits of info that call into question the defendant at hand. it bears no real significance that the matter was not heard because of jurisdiction; as long as it is on record as being said. it still strengthens the case and weakens Margo's credibility while raising more eyebrows to cheating. most likely the prosecutor's office would like this to go to a criminal trial where all relevant info will be brought to a jury to decide whether or not to indict
See that? Nothing wrong with a little speculation here on ESB. We are not morons or haters or anything stupid like that. We are just speculation here and it seems that laywers are as well :deal Fairplay