Who Wins at 168? Kessler vs Taylor?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Feb 17, 2009.


  1. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    Yeah, Pavlik applied relentless physical pressure...after being knocked down in the first fight and after trailing on points in the second. That requires serious mental toughness. The 2nd and 3rd round in their first fight show all the difference between a mentally weak fighter, who could not capitalize on his advantage and a mentally strong fighter, who shakes off a knockdown and wins the next round. Kessler fought Calzaghe with as much pressure behind a jab as Calzaghe ever encountered and despite trailing, Kessler never gave up and followed his gameplan. Similarities are there IMO.

    Also, why don't you address the fact that Taylor unerperformed several times in his career? His extra bag of tricks, where was it in some of his big fights when he really needed to prove himself?
     
  2. bjdhitman

    bjdhitman New Member Full Member

    26
    0
    Sep 22, 2008
    kessler by knock out!
     
  3. DStew

    DStew Active Member Full Member

    1,146
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    Again, never did I say that Taylor is a massive puncher... only that he's got enough pop to give Kessler problems... especially when Mikkel doesn't see those shots coming.
     
  4. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    kessler bring to much pressure for JT

    Kessler KO10
     
  5. scorpy

    scorpy Veni, Vidi, Vici Full Member

    1,317
    0
    Jul 23, 2004
    WTF ? :huh Do you know what a decade is ?
     
  6. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    i said dominant not most dominant
     
  7. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    Kessler = Pavlik at 168

    Pavlik > Taylor

    Therefore, Kessler > Taylor
     
  8. scorpy

    scorpy Veni, Vidi, Vici Full Member

    1,317
    0
    Jul 23, 2004
    Maybe but Kessler's first fight WAS ten years ago. You think he was dominant from his first fight ? As Maxime already pointed out, Kessler became relevant in this division when he won the WBA title from Manny Siaca. Saying he's been dominant for ten years is a big over statement.
     
  9. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I think we see a stronger Taylor at 168. Lacy was a good comeback fight. I'd like to see him in at least two more fights at 168 before Kessler. Taylor does need to learn to step into his punch a little more, but we saw Joe get away with 'meaningless' scoring flurries. :D
     
  10. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Because Taylor sucks and is overrated.He won't do nothing in this division.
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :-:)verysad:-:)verysad:-(
     
  12. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  13. DStew

    DStew Active Member Full Member

    1,146
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    What do you expect?

    One fighter has largely disappointed fans with his performances over the last four years, the other has looked fairly dominant on all but one occasion.

    Most people are choosing to overlook is that both fighters' lackluster performances have all come against top competition; the first guy (Taylor) has just faced a lot more of it, and more consistently, than the second (Kessler).

    Also, most fans look at Kessler and see a European version of Pavlik (better even, by many accounts)... a comparison I don't completely understand or agree with.
     
  14. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Even TFFP has modified his stance from a similar statement he once made.
     
  15. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007