Why is Pac rated higher than JMM at 130lbs???

so basically you are saying that jmm is the no.1 at 130 because pac's wins are overrated. if this have nothing to do with barrera, then jmm should not be no.1 because he became the 130 wbc champ because of a solitary win over barrera. you could put guzman, valero or maybe fana at no.1 above pac if you put too much regard on the belt.

again if that is your view about pac's accomplishment, you will have a hard time putting him at the top of 130. let a rematch next year see if you are right or wrong after all.

 

why is pac higher than jmm ? very simple.. just look at the picture and see what jmm is doing in that picture!! :good:good

This content is protected

 

MAB beat at 130lbs Erik Morales who was the #1 fighter at that time. then went on to defeat Fana, Peden, Juarez 2X then lost to JMM.

Manny first fight at 130lbs, he lost against Morales, he then went on to defeat morales twice, velazquez, larios, and solis.

so the #1 fighter in 130lbs is JMM

 

You are not taking into the account the momentum that Pac built after the Morales win. 2 moths after his destruction of Morales, JMM fought Chris John in Indonesia and lost a decision. Pac was at the top, JMM was at the bottom, since then Pac beat Larios, Morales and Solis and JMM struggled to beat his opponents only to reemerge after his win over Barrera. Because of this momentum Pac is #1. Now Pac is fighting Barrera and JMM is fighting Barrera's victim Juarez.

 

1. Pacquiao
2. Sotto
3. JMM
4. Guzman
5. MAB
6. Valero

 

At 130 lbs., Pac has done more than JMM, let JMM prove himself first at that weight, before this question can be answered objectively. Although Juarez fight won't raise his stock more as it is, assuming jmm gets past him. Same case with Pac-Mab, since he has beaten him prior, but IF Pac beats him in impressive fashion, then it will solidify his 130, P4P, etc. status more than a JMM win even if impressively.

 

Yes I'm saying that Pac is fighting Barrera who is not only a victim of JMM but Pac himself, however JMM is fighting an opponent who is a victim of Barrera twice and is moving up, definitly worse opponent then Barrera, so if both PAc and JMM win their bouts, Pac will gain more then JMM and his stock will rise even more. JMM beat John IMO as well but a loss is a loss even when you are robbed, your stock will drop as a result of it.

 

:good :yep :deal

 

so does jmm vs mab everybody in the world thought jmm would come off that fight guns_a_blazing.. yet he almost lost and many people think that mab did a lot to win that fight! the win of jmm isn't convincing enough! compare that to pac's win over barrera and you know what happened there! his brother cried like they lost a lollipop! now jmm's win over mab? what's so big about it?:huh pac's win over mab what so big about it? :catapulted pac to stardom! jmm's win over jaca.. what's so big about it? jmm would surely beat jaca! everyone knows it!(not that i'm underestimating my pinoy bro's) pac's win over larios? what's so big about it? though larios came up he and lost his previous fight, larios name is recognizable in the bantam's with his fights with mccullogh, vasquez,and hussein.. compare larios to jaca :-( or to john who jmm shamefully fought for peanuts.. or compare both jaca and john to em alone: a future atg..now compare this pac ko's 2 future atg's or p4p's '2 renowned mexicans, a draw to marques( though pac could have won by judge's mistake,)ud over a renowned bantam in larios(if you don't then youre ignorant),ko velas(though i'm not really crediting velasques cos his name is not that bloomy though at the time facing pac was never down in 5 yrs), k.o. against undefeated solis to any opponent marques fought? your only right to argue is mab and john: are they legit to brag about against pac's opponents?!!wtf!! you really are stupid! biggame loser just accept it and don't be sour about it! you're not as big as the ring mag. afterall!!! stfu!