was mike tyson the same fighter in 96 as in 91????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Mar 6, 2009.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    i wouldnt say that....he knocked tillis down.....he was 19 yrs old dude....i woulnt say ****
     
  2. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    :good

    power would definitely take places..even his fights with holyfield, here is still power in his punches..he just do not have the stamina
     
  3. gottagivafight

    gottagivafight When you least expect it, expect it!!! banned Full Member

    6,566
    1,792
    Jun 14, 2008
    That's a damn good point...and for him to do as well as he did when he returned from such a lapse is quite laudable.
     
  4. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007

    He probably got raped, that will do it to a man:lol:
     
  5. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    Who knows, It could have worked against him too.

    Those dudes probably don't care how bad you are cause if you **** with them they will have you shanked next week. It could have happened to put him in his place.

    pure speculation obviously.
     
  6. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006

    Well, we'll be able to find out soon enough.. Tyson is currently shopping his memoirs detailing his prison time. I'm really curious to hear about what it was like for him in there.

    I can't imagine even the hard-core prisoners were willing to give him a hard time in there. I'm sure he didn't have much trouble, and was probably pretty well liked and respected. It's not like he was some wall-street, white collar criminal..
     
  7. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    He as the same fighter, and matter of fact I thought he packed more power.

    Tyson in 96 was still at his prime. He looked awesome disposing bums like Mcneely, Mathis and journeymen Bruno and Seldon.
     
  8. Cerberus

    Cerberus Kérberos, Hound of Hades Full Member

    1,384
    1
    Jan 9, 2007
    Tyson in 96 = Prime? :patsch

    Power isn't every thing. Just cause he still had KO power don't mean he was prime. In 96, Tyson was clearly slowing down. Anyone who followed Tyson's career knows this. Tyson no longer threw combinations, no longer sustained the same head movement, reflexes were obviously fading, he was not the same fighter. It's clear as day.
     
  9. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    lets forget physical for a second... i really doubt tyson was mentally the same person when he got out of jail
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    I think Tyson was better in 1991 than 1996. He fought Ruddock and looked a little slower and sloppier than his title years in 1986-1989 but he still hung in there and had desire. In 1996 it seems like his desire went down a lot from 1991. And then later on in 2000 and later it seems like his tactic in a fight was to give it a good few first rounds and try to stop his opponent before he got tired.
     
  11. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    There were guys that tried to **** with him in jail. He knocked them out. Tyson was from the streets. He still is. As they say you can take a kid out of the ghetto but you cant take the ghetto out of the kid.
     
  12. Mrboogie23

    Mrboogie23 what the?? Full Member

    2,853
    98
    Jul 20, 2004

    :patsch


    Dude, no way was tyson the same fighter in 96 as he was pre prison. No way. Slower in the hand and footspeed department, refused to throw combinations, no head movement, and didnt jab his way inside. He looked like a different man.
     
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    He DID threw combinations. Re-watch the Holyfield fight, especially the 1st one. And no, he wasn't slowing down. People only said he was slowing down when he got beat by Holyfield.

    The Tyson who looked awesome aginst Mcneely looks exactly the guy who beat Michael Spinks. Head movement and a lot of bobbing and weaving there.

    Tyson looked sluggish against Holmes and was getting hit a lot by Bruno and Tucker in the late 80s. Was he past his prime back then then? Does that mean his prime only lasted 1 year?

    The culture here in ESB is that when a fighter losses, he is not prime anymore. Amazing really.

    Many are saying Barrera was not at his prime back in 2003 against Pac. I bet if Barrera beat Pac, everybody would have been saying that Barerra was at his prime up to 2006 when he schooled Juarez.