newbie ur knowledge about the 14o lb division shows...bradley is a good boxer..he is slick, quick, and knows how to counter....id favor bradley over paulie ne day...i wouldn't favor him over pac or hatton...i think nate and jmm would give him a hard time too....i think he'll edge out a ud against holt though1
Paulie can now beat Bradley because you assume Bradley wouldn't last two rounds against Hatton or Cotto? That's completely ridiculous. Bradley matches up way better with Hattton than Paulie did. Same thing with Cotto. Bradley was completely dominant against Cherry. He was much more impressive than Paulie. Cherry won about two rounds a piece of both guys. That was a bogus SD. That definately should've been a UD. Witter would knock Paulie around the ring as well. It's not like Witter is a terrible fighter either. Witter has a pretty good resume, was the reigning WBC champ and was a 10/1 favorite. Let's also not forget that Bradley was traveling halfway across the world and was taking a big step up in class. Paulie had to get a gift decision over Herman Ngoudjo. Paulie has nothing for Bradley, he would get his ass kicked. I can only assume that you're a Hatton fan.
holt is gonna knock bradley out. just like rated r said, experience is the difference in this fight. bradley has none. holt has plenty. I have been saying it for a long time now, holt will unify and become undisputed 140 champ. and in addition to that, bradley is a sucker for the left hook just waatch against ender. edner should not have been fighting at 140 anyways as he is a 135 fighter through and through.
How is Bradley the more complete fighter? :huh He's a bit one-dimensional to me. Very basic.. what you see is what you get.. Now Holt, he is a complete fighter. He can box or brawl, fight coming forwards or going backwards, better defense by far, uses head movement and his feet to his advantage.. the only thing holding Holt back is his chin
Bradley is good but he's like a smaller Kessler in a sense that he's very BASIC.. Watch when R-rated gets X rated up in that ****. Bradley is going to get hurt real bad.
From what ive seen of Bradley, he's a typical textbook fighter. A good fighter, but textbook. His footwork and his arsenal of punches are limited and he doesn't give his opponents much to think about... What you see is what u get pretty much.. I give him credit purely for the fact that he went into Witter's backyard and beat him but c'mon now, that was WITTER and he was pretty much nothing until he beat another non worldbeater in HARRIS... ANd beating a lightweight Cherry is hardly an accomplishment.. He's not versatile like Holt and his lack of experience will show in this fight.
Bradley can counter, has good defense, good movement, nice jab. Like I said before Holt loads up too much for my liking waiting to land the big shot he relies too much on his power more than he did earlier in his career and he's very sloppy at times he also has a very shaky chin. Bradley by far is the more accurate puncher his overall boxing game is more complete than Holt's and will prove it when the two meet next month.
Kendall Holt is underestimated. He seems to be lackadaisical, but when it counts, he is there and pulls the trigger (reminds me of Haye actually). In addition, he is the more marketable fighter. They mostly win big fights.