Is motivation severely under-rated in judging fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dark Sider, Mar 26, 2009.

  1. Dark Sider

    Dark Sider Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    0
    We always look at skills, achievements and past performance. But what about motivation?

    ie: Joe Calzaghe looking bad against weak opponents because he had no desire to train?

    Would a MOTIVATED Roy Jones Jr. have been KO'ed by Glen Johnson?

    So when we say "Fighter A SHOULD win based on his skills/talent/etc" we never really factor in when a guy DOES NOT care.
     
  2. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    8,001
    Likes Received:
    8
    What has that got to do with judging a fight? If a guy shows up half arsed, then he's half arsed. That's it.
     
  3. Dark Sider

    Dark Sider Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can analyze a fighter's strengths/weakness all day. But if he doesn't train, that analysis is useless.
     
  4. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    0
    motivation is everything. But how would you be able to look inside a man's heart and look to see if he's motivated before picking a winner? Not to mention most world class boxers are motivated each and every time they step in the ring, they know how important it is.
     
  5. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    We cannot use motivation to judge incoming fight nor past fights . . . because we can only guess how motivated the fighters are in their past fight or scheduled fights. :D