Would you buy the Froch fight if it was £5 rather than £10?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by JonOli, Apr 16, 2009.


  1. P4PNo.1

    P4PNo.1 Active Member Full Member

    576
    0
    Apr 7, 2009
    No I wouldn't pay anything for a stream. They ****ed up by not getting it on TV so why should we trust them to get this right?
     
  2. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    anyone see frochs qoutes in boxing weekly

    "i might turn my back on britain after this"

    lol- turn where carl? only the nottingham area for you my friend, he seems the type to throw the head up over simple economics and taking is personally.


    also i cant wait to read the **** thats going to be written on this site on the sunday morning when the stream ****s up or is a shitty quality. you guys are going to ****in crack me up then!
     
  3. TK Terrible

    TK Terrible Tuff Little Unit Full Member

    452
    0
    Dec 17, 2007
    You can almost guarantee that something will **** up tbh

    They should do a test cast to at least re-assure viewers, at least.
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    I can understand his frustration, he's won a legit world title the conventional way, is now defending against his number 1 contender away from home but can't get on UK TV.

    Unfortuneatly he should be blaming Hennessy not the TV execs.
     
  5. KenDubbs

    KenDubbs New Member Full Member

    52
    0
    Feb 17, 2009
    Personally I just can't see myself buying the stream as much as I might wish to. I just wish Hennessey would maybe take a lesser offer just to get Carl the television exposure.

    Unless they try and build up his profile a bit then he'll never reap the financial rewards he thinks he deserves.
     
  6. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    I'd never pay to watch it, always download the torrent the next morning.
     
  7. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  8. Grievesy

    Grievesy Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,470
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    Nope. Unless it's on TV I'm just not going to bother watching it and download it in the morning.

    I'm not paying for a stream. Hate the things anyway, they're so unreliable.
     
  9. dazzpowder

    dazzpowder Member Full Member

    290
    5
    Dec 8, 2008
    Nope. £10 for a video stream? no fecking way
     
  10. mithffg

    mithffg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,816
    167
    Feb 22, 2007
  11. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  12. MaliSlamusrex

    MaliSlamusrex Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,249
    1
    Nov 10, 2008
    you can never really watch the live streams, i wouldn't want to pay £10 for something i would find hard to watch.
     
  13. Claypole

    Claypole Boxing Addict banned

    7,071
    4
    Aug 4, 2007
    I'm still holding out for Setanta to pull something out of the bag, just like they did with Haye v Mormeck.

    That website does say it's there in case they can't get a T.V. deal, so I'm hoping there's still time for somebody to make the right decision.
     
  14. HOF

    HOF Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,873
    0
    Feb 10, 2008
    Thats a really good point. Wether it's a fiver or a tenner probably won't make much difference to people in the grand scheme of things. But it's that decision people might make on fight night about whether to say 'it's only a fiver so yeah **** it' or 'i can't be bothered wasting a tenner on that'. Big problem in terms of total buys is people not wanting to pay to watch a fight and sit in front of a frigging laptop or something. It can be played through the telly and to be fair Froch's site has given advice on how to do it but it lost me!

    http://www.cobraboxing.com/forum/index.php/topic,1031.0.html
     
  15. kerrminator

    kerrminator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,552
    169
    Sep 14, 2007
    Setanta is
    a) Cheaper
    b) Has better fights
    c) dont do PPV (one subscription buys all)
    d) provide a weekly boxing magazine programme
    e) Acknowledge fighters from other networks

    SKY charge 40 odd quid a month then an extra 15 quid for bull**** like Khan v Prescott whereas Setanta gave us Diaz v Marquez (FOTY contender) and Cotto v Marg and the upcoming Haye world HW title fights etc