Yea the same David Diaz that the *******s put on the pedestal like he's some great fighter on Pac's resume. lol
I had Morales losing 5-7 rounds. To me that fight was a clear example of Morales being shot. He had no legs after the fifth round, was being pushed around, and although he had some shining moments he looked off balance and phased more than ever by punches. To have so much trouble with someone of David Diaz's caliber makes it obvious that the good old Morales was completely gone.
because he took a **** in the philipines once and said a few nice things. how dare barerra not show up for mannys bday?!!! hes got no class!
problem with erik is that he never carried his power and speed as he moved up in weight. thats what separate the other 3 ( mab, JMM, pac ) from erik
To the first bit yes. Did you ever see Morales before Pacquiao fought him ?, are you aware how good he was ?
It wasn't just pac, did you forget Morales had been fighting for over thirteen years before pac fought Morales?
You can say this for the rest of your lifetime and *******s won't or can't comprehend this simple fact.
I thought Morales beat Diaz too but think of these things..... 1. Would a prime Morales have struggled so badly with Diaz ? 2. Look what Pacquiao did to Diaz compared to what Morales did to Diaz keeping in mind that only 2 yrs before, Morales beat Pacquiao. 3. Beating a ****, skill-less fighter like Diaz doesnt mean your not shot. 4. Erik can still throw his hands pretty well but his foot movement is completely gone & IMO those feet were as good as anybodies in boxing & helped him out in both offense & defence. 5. I pray your right but I think its all over for Morales, I really do. 6. I would say he is closer to shot than simply past prime.