Who do you rate higher: Bernard Hopkins or Roy Jones Jr?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Apr 18, 2009.


  1. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Who do you rate more highly?

    This is a tough question for me, I will sit on the fence at the moment, but I'm actually leaning towards Hopkins.
     
  2. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    Jones by some margin.
     
  3. cupid

    cupid LONDONER Full Member

    1,786
    0
    Jan 17, 2009
    Hopkins he atleast dint duck punchers
     
  4. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    If Hopkins fights and beats Adamek, than its a close debate.

    but for now its RJJ no question about it IMO
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    63
    Dec 1, 2008
    This is similar to that Hearns/Tyson poll who was greater. Tyson was a tough guy when he was prime, but Hearns whole career and longevity makes him a much greater fighter than Tyson. Hopkins has a better career than Jones..
     
  6. Lupe

    Lupe Member Full Member

    350
    0
    Apr 25, 2006
    Jones >>> Hopkins
     
  7. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Longevity is exactly right.

    Jones' has been on the slide since 2003.

    Whereas Hopkins just schooled the Middleweight King in 2008.

    I think 'who had the better career' is entirely dependent on how highly someone regards picking up John Ruiz's world title @ HW.
     
  8. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    63
    Dec 1, 2008
    I agree. Ruiz was a guy who could not punch hard so all Jones had to do was fight his usually fight and win with his speed and he did. I think Hopkins has beaten tougher guys. Jones wouldn't have even taken on Pavlik.
     
  9. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    jones by a very slight margin...you have to say that jones was the longest running p4p king...but bhop is one monumental win away from entering top 20 ATG...maybe against adamek, valuev or dawson...i had both of them in the top 30
     
  10. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,422
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    Resume? Hopkins. Skill level + natural gift? Probably Jones. Overall? Hopkins.

    I see these Hopkins-Jones polls changing in years. 2005: Jones ranked higher, polls not even close. 2010: 50/50. 2015: Hopkins ranked higher, not even close. Give it time, and justice will be done.

    Jones has a slightly overrated resume as he picked his opposition very carefully for the 2nd half of his career, pre-Tarver (who he was forced to fight to get back his titles), especially the John "Quiet Hug" Ruiz and the 'LHW terror run' gets too much credit (Roy never baceme the undisputed or legitimate linear champ, Dariusz Michalczewski was the lineal champ, who was stripped of the IBF and WBA belts. Other than the WBC, Roy picked up paper titles.)

    Hopkins' resume and divisional domination at 160 (all 4 titles, 21 defenses, only debated losses post-Roy) is slightly underrated (especially the pre-Tito era, as well as his performances in losing (Taylor, Calzaghe at LHW). Hopkins beat much more top elite fighter than Roy and never lost a wide decision, the widest was a 116-112-like to Jones. Hopkins clearly has the better resume, and when people will realize that behind the awesomeness of Roy's flashy style and the HBO hype he had (still building a strong ATG resume), there's much less real quality than he's credited for. Hopkins is the opposite: his legend is still growing ever stronger with people realizing that he was a special fighter even in those years when he fought under the radar. It's not the first time the flashy/popular fighter loses a lot of credibility when the hype is over and the less-exciting, hard-working guy is earning his credit step by step. Yes, Roy beat Bernard, whatever version that was. But the counter-argument is that Hopkins knocked out Roy-beater Glen Johnson, absolutely schooled Tarver and came close to beat Calzaghe. These are the guys Roy lost to.

    Now speaking about skills and technical side, Roy's edge is becoming smaller and smaller as it's evident now that he always relied on his physical gifts, and when those started to fade, he became an average flashy fighter, bad losses came and he never could change his style to his late-30s physical condition. Hopkins on the other hand, after being a very aggressive pressure fighter, he became a defensive master at his late 30s, and became even better in his early 40s (he landed more shots and took less vs. Pavlik than back in 2001 vs. Tito!). Roy also had steroid issues, which is VERY SERIOUS in my book, especially for a fighter who's absolutely depeding on his physical gifts like speed, mobility and stamina (that's why Mosley lost tons of credit in my book).
     
  11. Godfather

    Godfather I put the G in God Full Member

    407
    2
    Jun 10, 2008
    Hopkins. They are close but there is a clear gap between the two IMO
     
  12. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    you can make a case that jones was the p4p king from 1996-2001 (some say that dela hoya and mosley is p4p king in the latter part but i go for jones).....that's six years. Longer than the reign of chavez and sweet pea...quite an accomplishment that is hard to duplicate
     
  13. scousedave

    scousedave Member Full Member

    104
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    joe calzaghe!! kicked both their arses!!
     
  14. Bing

    Bing Active Member Full Member

    668
    4
    Jul 14, 2007
    I'd go for Jones. Bhop does have longevity on him though.
     
  15. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    Good post BigBone. I'll be going with Hopkins too