Joe Louis vs Mike Tyson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Apr 24, 2009.


  1. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Makes you wonder what the glove's were like in Louis day? (Size/Padding/Oz. ect...)
    I disagree on Joe having a bad chin, considering Mike was also Ko'ed multiple times.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,750
    47,578
    Mar 21, 2007
    Joe Louis has a great chin.

    He was stopped twice, once pre-prime, once post-prime, both time by insane, sustanined beatings from elite punchers.

    Tyson's chin is better in terms of pure punch resistance, but in terms of real-wired momentum changing chin at the highest level, he's a close second for me. Never been off the canvas to win.
     
  3. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Yep.
     
  4. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Louis, Although Tyson is capable of winning.
     
  5. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    :good
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    190lbs vs 220lb prime Tyson who was faster, bigger, stronger and better defensively? Yeah we know the answer here kids.
     
  7. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Louis by late TKO. Too good of a jab and that short right hand would catch Mike coming in everytime. MIke was great & all but not against a polished boxer with power such as the Brown Bomber.
     
  8. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    It is hard to compare guys from such different eras. I doubt anyone in the 1930's and 1940's compares to a young Mike Tyson of 1987 or so.
     
  9. Deebo

    Deebo Pure Textual Satisfaction Full Member

    1,230
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not quite correct....

    [YT]5_RFGGcgfJs[/YT]
     
  10. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Other than there height (baring in mind Mike was taller) there are NO comparisons between Frazier and Tyson. Mike was superior in EVERY aspect than Frazier.
     
  11. benhazin

    benhazin New Member Full Member

    68
    0
    May 25, 2006
    Tyson didn't beat Holyfield because his boxing skills were inferior to Holyfields. His firepower could not save him. Louis was a better boxer than Tyson and he feared no one. The boxers who were not afraid of Tyson whipped his ass. I pick Louis by ko, with Tyson having a punchers chance.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,750
    47,578
    Mar 21, 2007

    WTF man, tell me when it was that Tyson exhibeted better

    Heart
    Pressure
    Endurance
    Stamina

    than Joe Frazier?

    The only place there are NO COMPARISONS between them are their best wins, Muhammad Ali for Joe and...what? Ex-Lightheavyweight champion Micheal Spinks for Mike? Or washed up Holmes?
     
  13. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    I agree Louis wins BUT Tyson was rusty when he fought Holy due to his prison time, IMO alot of guys were not scared of Tyson and still lost, Louis wins because he is better not because he isn't afraid.
     
  14. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    Tyson, too big and too fast.
     
  15. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Tyson by KO, if Max Baer can KO Louis then sure as hell Tyson can. Dont bring up Buster Douglas.lol.