Floyd Mayweather makes his critics look stupid!!

I remeber that ****, Kenny is a punk. "WHY are you fighting Judah, you need to fight Baldmoir to be champ" Kenny kinda has a bigger mouth then Mayweather

 

Guys, ur wasting ur time, MrPR is a tool, check out some of his older threads.

 

Going by that logic you would have to say Pac is too big for Marquez now then. Right?

 

Don't put words on the guy's mouth. Anybody with brain would interpret that as Pac having more experience going up above 140 than JMM.

. . . AND IF the Pac/JMM III fight would happen it will be at 140 not at 143; 144 or 147. :deal

 

:rofl Nice

But really, have u every wrote a unbais post or thread?

Oh, unbais means a inbetween view. Not hating, not nuthugging.

I seem to remember the first 6 threads u wrote were Calzaghe hating.
Fair enought if u don't like a fighter for whatever reason, but 6 hater threads?! atsch

 

I didnt put anything in his mouth. I asked a damn question. Going by your logic 140 is still too high. Marquez is a lightweight. Once Floyd beats him above 140 that doesn't mean he's fit to fight Pac at 140.

 

Classic response from exposed tools.

 

So psycho, once floyd beats Marquez and schools Pac you gonna jump back on the Mayweather bandwagon like you do after his wins? Or are you firmly in the "anti-Mayweather" camp. Just for reference. :thumbsup

 

Exactly, so if he can fight marquez at 143, how come he won't do the same for pacquiao? He just contradicted himself like a jackass

 

That doesn't mean??? According to who's logic?

If you are saying that 140 is still too high for Marquez . . . then what does the JMM fight at 143 mean? A side show? A 135 pounder going up to 140 will always be acceptable to people than the guy going up to 143. :deal

 

Nah nah nah . . . bruh . . . I never jump to anybody's bandwagon . . . I always give props to the winner even if I picked his opponents . . . and I never make excuses.

I'm a real fan of the sport . . . not a nuthugger not a sour loser. Now that should be a good refference. :deal

JMM has no chance on this fight . . . I'm telling you that rightnow.
But I'm still hoping for his victory.
:good

 

i don't know from what planet the writer comes from. it was flyod way of reasoning that makes him like stupid and not the other way around. floyd, during the interview with kelly, was absolutely inconsistent in his way of reasoning. first, he said that he do not want to fight mosely because the later was a losser but when kelly reminded him that marquez too was a losser floyd shifted his line of argument by saying that mosely is not a pvp attraction. so also, when kelly reminded floyd that mosely is a pvp material than marquez , floyd countered that marquez is back by the entire country of mexico. to make my story short, floyd practically was not responsive to the questions raised by kelly. those are valid and material questions deserving answers from a person who claims as the king p4p. besides those questions were based on factual observation. also, one of floyd's argument why he is the best p4p is the fact that he is undefeated. what a fallacy! if being undefeated is the prevailing criteria then, valero should be the rightful person to claim the honor and not floyd. valero's record is far more superior than floyd. lastly, i believe that it is not for the individual or particular boxer to claim that he is the king p4p. the boxing pundits, their unanimous opinion matters.

 

Exactly. And the fact that the 2 opponents are common opponents of Floyd in which Pac was far more impressive against only fuels the arguement.

 

Agree!