Dainty_randy, floydette par excellance is insisting that pac is way bigger than jmm in response to my assertion that pbf is fighting an older and smaller man in JMM. they fought at 126 and at 130 if my memory serves me right and was darned sure that both fighters were of the same height, same built and same weight. here comes dainty_randy insisting that pac fought a smaller and older man in jmm with the latter whipping pacs ass. On top of that, dainty_randy is insisting that Pac has broader shoulders, bigger trunk, bigger legs, thicker neck than pbf. i am beginning to wonder if we are looking at the same fighter. so is pac bigger than JMM and PBF physically?
Pac is defo naturaly bigger than JMM. ( This content is protected pounds gained after weigh-in/fight #2 confirms that) That said, Floyd is still bigger than both.
Quote: Originally Posted by scatterbrain let me read it again. pac is bigger than JMM? dainty_randy answer. Yes, as evidence by the fact that Pac has been able to comfortably make 147. :huh:huh:huh they fought at 126 and at 130 almost to an standstill after both fights. how can pac be naturally bigger than JMM. sure he can regain weight after the weighin but is it that signficant. pac weight 138 for a 140 fight. does it not give people an idea how he truly weighs?
true, floyd is still bigger than both but give me a minute. i will post danny_rands posts insisting pac has broader shoulders, bigger trunk, thicker neck and thicker legs than pbf. and pac supposedly appears bigger than pbf when i said that as much as a pac fan that i am, i see pbf with all the advantage in height, reach, weight, size etc. some of these floydettes annoy me to death. i wish pbf fights mosley, cotto or any of those fighters from 147-154.
reposting this conversation with dainty_randy. of course he ran away and did not bother to refute it. lets do this again. for the clown who has been caught lying. your post yesterday. "Pacquiao actually looks like he has the thicker legs and thicker neck. Broader shoulders aswell." now pac has the thicker legs, thicker neck, unusually thick ankles and boarder shoulders compared to PBF. So you saying man, that they are about the same size but Pac is bigger in these aspects. can you pass me some of that **** your smoking. must be one good hallucinogen.
For me there is the problem that a lot of people consider Pac very small because he is coming from featherweight. But Pac is not that small. First someone said that Pac is coming 138 for a 140 fight. At fight night pac was 148!!! And he looked good on that weight he wasn't blown up. Hatton weighted four pounds more. He has the same height but Pac has a small reach advantage!!!So yes of course Pac is a great fighter no doubt about that. But people are creating the myth of the small Pacman destroying the bigger guys which is not so correct.
how can a 106 pound philipino be bigger in size than a 126 pound mexican ( weight of pac man and Jmm when they started) 5 of you are nuts so far... Jmm will easily put the muscle that pac man put on.
JMM was the bigger man when he met up with Pac at 126.. by the time they met up again at 130 Pac then seemed like the bigger, stronger man. I'd say since Pac has already been to welterweight and JMM has yet to fill out that that weight, Manny is still the slightly bigger man... but let Marquez get adjusted to the weight and in a few months and they'll probably be at the exact same size again.
PBF: 5'8, 72" reach, last fight night weight: 149?? (does anyone know?) Pac: 5'6 1/2, 67" reach , last fight night weight: 148 JMM: 5'7, 67" reach, last fight night weight: ?? I don't know the weights, but PBF definitely is bigger than both in terms of height and reach, while Pac is around the same as JMM In terms of weight I'm thinking PBF>Pac>JMM, bust most agree that the main reason Pac is a bit heavy is because of his legs. So overall, PBF definitely has a size and weight advantage over both. With Pac being around the same size as JMM but much heavier.