Fact or Fiction: Younger Hopkins...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kaki, Jun 7, 2009.


  1. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    i said yes on both but in reality I don't think prime Hopkins could dominate Calzaghe. He'd pull out a close UD in my opinion but no way domination.
     
  2. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Agreed!
     
  3. Machine

    Machine Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Sep 29, 2004
    I don't think the Hop/Calzaghe fight turns out much differently if they were both in their physical primes. Whatever Hopkins has lost in athleticism he has made up in ring smarts. Hopkins put on his greatest performance, according to himself, after he'd already lost to Calzaghe, so that would have to make you question whether Hopkins could be considered over the hill when he fought Calzaghe despite his age.
     
  4. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    H2H calzaghe would have beaten BHOP in a close UD.
     
  5. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  6. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    yes on 1 and thats it

    the only crime in hopkins vs calzaghe was that it should have been a UD instead of a split....that fight is not as close as the scorecards suggest, clazaghe beats any version of "bucktooth nard" thats what i call him after the "i wont ever lose to a whiteboy comment"