Cotto instead of Mosley

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Silver, Jun 16, 2009.


Page 2 of 3
  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,104
    Jul 19, 2004
    Complete and total bull****.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    #16
  2. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    nope

    margarito cheats :deal

    cotto beat mosley :deal
     
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    #17
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,104
    Jul 19, 2004
    Say what you want. Since the highly debatable razor thin win Cotto had over Mosley, Cotto went on to get his ass kicked by the same man who Mosley totally took to school.

    And based on what I saw Saturday, Cotto definitely lost something after the Margo fight that he will probably never get back.

    The reason Pacquiao wants Cotto instead of Mosley should be OBVIOUS to anyone with half a brain.

    It's because Mosley presents a much tougher challenge to Pacquiao.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    #18
  4. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :patsch You fail...There is no proof that he cheated in the Cotto fight...Speculation doesnt work man.
     
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    #19
  5. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    Accurate.:smoke
     
    TroubleLurks, Jun 16, 2009
    TroubleLurks, Jun 16, 2009
    #20
  6. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Got any proof of that? Just because he was caught for Mosley doesnt mean he cheated for Cotto.:patsch
     
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    #21
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pacquiao wants either Cotto or Mosley and has gone on record saying he will fight either of them or the winner of Mayweather vs Marquez.

    Arum wants Pacquiao vs Cotto because he promotes both fighters
     
    PH|LLA, Jun 16, 2009
    PH|LLA, Jun 16, 2009
    #22
  8. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    yet mosley fought a cement less margarita..:hey
     
    FrochPascal, Jun 16, 2009
    FrochPascal, Jun 16, 2009
    #23
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,104
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why do you think he's choosing Cotto over Mosley?

    I'd be SHOCKED if Pac fought Mosley, in all honesty. Mosley is all wrong for Pac, and Roach knows it.

    He's gonna fight Cotto.

    Mosley was willing to concede everything Pac wanted--catch weight, 40-60 purse split, and an immediate rematch clause in the even of a Mosley win.

    Instead of taking him up on that and starting a negotiations process, he waited, and then a day after Cotto's lackluster effort, he seeks a fight with Cotto?

    Come on, man, it is crystal clear what's going on here.

    Roach and Pac are choosing the safer option in Cotto.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    Rumsfeld, Jun 16, 2009
    #24
  10. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Prove he used plaster in the Cotto fight.:-(
     
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    Rudyard, Jun 16, 2009
    #25
  11. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Just imagine how shot hes confidence was going into the ring for Mosley:-(

    :yep
     
    FrochPascal, Jun 16, 2009
    FrochPascal, Jun 16, 2009
    #26
  12. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    LOL, now you're talkin bull****.

    fail? speak for yourself. i suppose sammy sose only corked his bat once too. there's a reason why margarito's victories are now in question. deep down, you know it.

    same as i said above



    bottom line: mosley's old, even non hardcore boxing fans know this. and cotto already beat mosley, close but clear. mosley ain't gettin younger. and you freaks want him in the ring with pacquiao, look what happened to oscar!
    beating a non cheating margarito doesn't say much either.
    that is why "cotto instead of mosley"

    you'll just have to keep debating with yourselves.

    :smoke
     
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    #27
  13. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    exactly
     
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    H ., Jun 16, 2009
    #28
  14. AW0L

    AW0L Active Member Full Member

    564
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    this is one of thoughs situations where hes F if he does F if he dosent.
    pick cotto and people will say hes avoiding ssm, cotto isnt the same or catch weight BS even if a catch weight puts a 90/90% fight instead of a 100/80% at 142 or 147.. pick SSM and hes picking a old man thats clearly past his prime and cant make weight. pick Floyed if it happens, some will say hes picking the easiest of the three. its not like he can pick all three for this single outting, theres a damn line for pac. these 3 are the potential and he says 2 more fights so hes probably gonna fight 2 of these 3. and hopfully a final with marquez.

    theres a line and they can wait there turn.
     
    AW0L, Jun 16, 2009
    AW0L, Jun 16, 2009
    #29
  15. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    either but if i had to choose i would say cotto
     
    Auracle21, Jun 16, 2009
    Auracle21, Jun 16, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 3