James Toney vs Carl Froch @ 168

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Jun 17, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,100
    9,478
    Jun 23, 2008
    ???
     
    Xplosive, Jun 17, 2009
    Xplosive, Jun 17, 2009
    #1
  2. Shattered Glass

    Shattered Glass Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,048
    0
    May 30, 2009
    Weird match-up...

    Got to go with Toney unless he underestimated Froch as he sometimes did with opponents. The guy is a MASTER of defense and attack.
     
    Shattered Glass, Jun 17, 2009
    Shattered Glass, Jun 17, 2009
    #2
  3. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm guessing Toney in his prime? Because there is no way Toney could make 168lbs now. :lol:

    In his prime Toney would easily beat Froch.

    120-108 Toney
     
    Maxime, Jun 17, 2009
    Maxime, Jun 17, 2009
    #3
  4. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    Is this a fantasy match or real one???

    Fantasy, Toney is too slick for Froch...

    Reality... Toney will never make 168 even if he has surgery.
     
    Lee Mc, Jun 17, 2009
    Lee Mc, Jun 17, 2009
    #4
  5. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    Assuming modern liposuction techniques have advanced to the impossibly high level needed for such a fight to happen, it would probably be a good fight. Toney would win on points.

    But back in the real world, Toney is more likely to fight Haye first. Now that's a fight I want to see!
     
    homebrand, Jun 17, 2009
    homebrand, Jun 17, 2009
    #5
  6. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Toney would KO him at anytime. Even Toney's weakest suit, his footwork, is made to look brilliant by Froch. I can't imagine Carl taking 12 rounds of punishment from Toney.
     
    TFFP, Jun 17, 2009
    TFFP, Jun 17, 2009
    #6
  7. scharters

    scharters Member Full Member

    439
    0
    Apr 25, 2009
    haha close the topic, froch my ass! boring post
     
    scharters, Jun 17, 2009
    scharters, Jun 17, 2009
    #7
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,100
    9,478
    Jun 23, 2008
    I was refering to the prime Toney @ 168.
     
    Xplosive, Jun 17, 2009
    Xplosive, Jun 17, 2009
    #8
  9. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,300
    17,088
    Jul 29, 2004
    Forget about Froch winning a round..he would be hardpressed winning an exchange in this fight..Even against an uninterested Toney.
     
    WhataRock, Jun 17, 2009
    WhataRock, Jun 17, 2009
    #9
  10. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    What James Toney the heavy weight....?
     
    REEVO, Jun 17, 2009
    REEVO, Jun 17, 2009
    #10
  11. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Why? There really is no need to ask a question that the answer is so obvious.
     
    charlievint, Jun 17, 2009
    charlievint, Jun 17, 2009
    #11
  12. Carnage

    Carnage KingFroch Full Member

    2,502
    0
    Jan 9, 2009
    I know, Froch would beat Toney eaaasily!
     
    Carnage, Jun 17, 2009
    Carnage, Jun 17, 2009
    #12
  13. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Right! Crack will leave you with a vast shortage of brain cells.:rasta
     
    charlievint, Jun 17, 2009
    charlievint, Jun 17, 2009
    #13
  14. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Would it be fair to say James Toney is abit of a legend from what i have read.
     
    REEVO, Jun 17, 2009
    REEVO, Jun 17, 2009
    #14
  15. TheSweetScience

    TheSweetScience Linares the next ATG!!! Full Member

    968
    0
    Dec 10, 2008
    I think Toney would win a decision but it would be competitive
     
    TheSweetScience, Jun 17, 2009
    TheSweetScience, Jun 17, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2