Did Ricky Hatton deserved his 2 fights against P4P #1 boxers?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jun 24, 2009.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    He was still moving down.
     
  2. rapidHOOK

    rapidHOOK The Champ is HERE Full Member

    3,658
    0
    Aug 31, 2008
    NO - Hatton is overrated, he shouldn't have been ranked in the Top 10 P4P

    dont take my word for it watch the fights, no fellow p4per is meant to recieve to 1 sided beatdowns

    pac and floyd made hatton look like a bum, simple
     
  3. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    If not due to his popularity and money that he can bring he wouldn't have given a chance to dance with the p4p #1. his skills & resume can't justify his worthiness.
     
  4. digger

    digger Member Full Member

    176
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    YeS
     
  5. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Dear God! Have you watched Pac-Barrera I, Forrest-Mosley I, Hopkins-Trinidad, Jones-Toney, Mayweather-Corrales? All pound for pounders and all lost far less competitive fights than Mayweather-Hatton.

    I voted yes, clearly. Hatton was ranked top 8 p4p when he fought Mayweather and the clear #1 at 140. Whilst you could argue there were guys at 140 Mayweather should have been facing, we quite often see the champ at one division go straight up and face the champ at the next. If Hatton, at 43-0, linear champ and 147 title holder with 2 p4p fighters on his record isn't a deserving challenger then there aren't many who are. As for Pacquiao, he was the challenger for Hatton not vice-versa. Both guys have fought a hell of a lot of worse fighters than Ricky Hatton over the past few years, despite mixing in very good company generally.
     
  6. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008
    [quote="TKO";4339231]Dear God! Have you watched Pac-Barrera I, Forrest-Mosley I, Hopkins-Trinidad, Jones-Toney, Mayweather-Corrales? All pound for pounders and all lost far less competitive fights than Mayweather-Hatton.

    I voted yes, clearly. Hatton was ranked top 8 p4p when he fought Mayweather and the clear #1 at 140. Whilst you could argue there were guys at 140 Mayweather should have been facing, we quite often see the champ at one division go straight up and face the champ at the next. If Hatton, at 43-0, linear champ and 147 title holder with 2 p4p fighters on his record isn't a deserving challenger then there aren't many who are. As for Pacquiao, he was the challenger for Hatton not vice-versa. Both guys have fought a hell of a lot of worse fighters than Ricky Hatton over the past few years, despite mixing in very good company generally.[/quote]


    PAC was the challenger to Hatton's titles but PAC is #1 P4P and installed as the 2 to 1 favorite to defeat Hatton...

    Lesser boxers than Hatton fought Floyd and PAC when both occupying #1 P4P slot?? This is highly debatable... I think Ricky Hatton was the worst fighter PBF and PAC fought when they were/are already installed as the best boxer P4P #1 ...
     
  7. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    If you look at the fight results (specially the one against PAC), it seems Hatton doesn't deserved to be inside the same ring with a #1 P4P guy... The beatdowns were brutal... The #1 P4P guy looked 2 levels up over Hatton...
    .
     
  8. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,504
    1,761
    Nov 20, 2007
    I wonder when you're going to open a "Did Pacquiao deserve a shot at De La Hoya and 140 World Champion Ricky Hatton?" thread. :lol:
     
  9. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Maybe he was, but the challenger nonetheless. IMHO you're putting way too much store in this whole P4P thing. It is not, and never has been, a title which a fighter defends, an official status or anything of the sort. It is simply a subject view where one person's opinion can differ totally from another's though most people tend to use Ring ratings. My point was that both have fought for world titles over the last few years against many worse fighters than Ricky Hatton. Just as a few Baldomir, Judah, Gatti, Diaz, Solis.

    Hell, you only have to go back to Diaz for Pac fighting a worse fighter whilst ranked p4p #1. Yeah, I know Diaz fight went longer, but his overall record and achievements are not on the level of Hatton's.
     
  10. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Yes.

    He was clearly ill when he fought Tszyu.

    Shot when he fought Mayweather.

    Anyone who disagrees needs to study boxing.
     
  11. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    Haven't voted because I don't like the options. I'l just say this, if all their opponents had to "deserve" a fight against either of them, they'd each have less than five names on their record.
     
  12. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Man you must really be and idiot to put Pac against Paul Williams if you are Pac manager. This is going to be one freak show haha
     
  13. Pride In Battle

    Pride In Battle Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Mar 30, 2009
    Ryan says..."hmm" is a **** lol
     
  14. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    ^^^
    hmm says... coming from a disgruntled Hatton fan :|:|:|
    You tell me if Hatton was or is worthy to hold the title P4P....:verysad



    fail
     
  15. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    I dunno if PAC was chasing those fights since as far as I can remember, PAC did walked out from the negotiations of both fights... The promoters did a good job tho and the fights were realized...

    Basing from the fights results, PAC deserved the shot on Hoya and Hatton... There's no argument here... ;)
    .