Froch vs Dirrell = Lacy vs Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Taylex, Jul 22, 2009.


  1. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Allot of American posters are coming on ESB and hyping Dirrell in the same way the hyped Lacy and predicting easy victory for Dirrell.

    You guys never learn your lesson. Pascal is equally skilful and just as fast as Dirrell but a hell of allot stronger and yet Froch found a way to win.

    Dirrell has been seriously stunned by a few of the tomato cans he has fought so why do you think he can take Froch's pressure and power?

    I feel as though I have been here before pre Lacy Calzaghe.
     
  2. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    i agree dirrell is very green and although he may have the skill set to eventually beat froch, he may or may not be able to do it now...

    but are you comparing froch to calzaghe??? b/c lacy was completely outclassed by joe whereas i don't see froch "outclassing" dirrell...he maybe able to weather everything dirrell has and stop him ala the jt fight...
     
  3. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    I think Froch should be favored over Direll, but why is it that British posters always call any American prospect a "hypejob" like Jeff Lacy.

    Lets not forget many Brits even thought Lacy was going to beat Calzaghe.
     
  4. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    I am not saying Dirrell is hype job I just think his level of comp prior to this fight dont justify comments like "Dirrell will win easy" " KO victory" "Domination" etc. That is ludicrous.
     
  5. MAYLO

    MAYLO Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    May 21, 2009
    No chance itll be the same! Calslappy won every round and dominated every minute of that fight. Froch will probably be even or down on the cards at the point he MIGHT stop Dirrell
     
  6. Goose

    Goose Russian oligarch Full Member

    8,207
    5,561
    Mar 2, 2005
    you can't compare a fast handed boxer/puncher like dirrell with a plodder like lacy.....apples and oranges
     
  7. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,454
    15,367
    Dec 6, 2008
    Yeah Americans never learn after that one really isolated example right? :patsch

    I'm not even American.
     
  8. Shane_Erich

    Shane_Erich Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,165
    2
    May 18, 2007
    Froch might win, but it's stupid to compare it to Lacy-Calzaghe.

    And i've seen every televised Dirrell fight, when was he ever seriously hurt?
     
  9. Trendkiller

    Trendkiller 420 Full Member

    684
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    he could well be the new lacy, dont think froch will ever be a calzaghe tho....
     
  10. Solid Chin

    Solid Chin Concrete Wars Full Member

    3,953
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    Dude dont be silly, that's just laughable. Dirrell is 10 times more skilled than Jeff Lacy will ever be, Jeff Lacy was just a power house who met somebody who could show him angles and he did not know what to do once he saw that there was no target to hit.

    Dirrell on the other hand is going to make Froch look completely stupid in the ring. Froch is slow and he holds his hands by his waist. Dirrell is light years quicker than both Taylor and Pascal and he is much more accurate as well.

    You need to shift your emphasis away from power and look at skill.
    Froch' best weapon is his jab and his sweeping uppercut along with his chin and his grit and determination and his stamina in the championship rounds.

    Dirrell's skills are, Switch hitting, he can fight from either stance and throw good with both hands, he is laser fast and accurate, he has great lateral movement. He can hit you with punches from different angles, he however has not gone 12 rounds before but I really do not see this becoming a factor unless Froch somehow catches him which is highly unlikely

    Froch is basically fighting a better version of Taylor that will be hitting him probably even more than Taylor did. If Froch gets stunned and drop like he did in the 3rd round against Taylor Dirrell will finish him.

    Froch deserves the credit he is getting but if it wasn't for Taylor's inefficiency to fight to the finish he would of won the fight so Froch got a lucky escape and a dramatic win but he will be embarressed in his own hometown come October.

    His limitations will be exploited in this fight and Dirrell will look 10 times faster than him and will be landing at will

    Have you not heard either that Dirrell was putting a whooping down on Chad Dawson in sparring when Chad used to have Floyd Senior as his trainer, this guy is not someone you take lightly.

    Dirrell is going to put a clinic on Froch. Froch is just living off of his dramatic Taylor win but This is a post Pavlik, Hopkins Taylor we are talking about. So to be honest Froch caught him at the right time and all respect to him he did the business and won in dramatic fashion but he will be a one hit wonder and will probably lose every fight he has in this tournament.

    He will never be Joe Calzaghe, never lol and he will probably lose to Kessler as well which would make it worse seeing as Calzaghe beat Kessler.
     
  11. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Comparing Froch to Calzaghe is like comparing Valuev to Ali. One's an unskilled, slow, hypejob with nothing but a good chin, the other is an all time great.
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    In general, people don't have as much respect for Froch as they should. 'Americans' has nothing to do with it.

    If British nationalists are backing Froch just because he's a Brit that's just as stupid, no?
     
  13. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    Dirrell is just as athletic as Pascal and he's definetly quite a bit quicker and sharper. Not to mention he has better defense and counter punching than Pascal. If Pascal's speed and athleticism bothered him so badly I think it goes without question that Dirrell's speed and athleticism combined with better defense will do the same and could definetly give him that extra push that Pascal needed to win. I think Froch is gonna have a real hard time getting to Dirrell.
     
  14. DirtMcGirt

    DirtMcGirt Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Jul 2, 2008
    If anything Dirrell will play Joe and Froch will be Lacy. there's no way in hell Froch will take Dirrell to school. he might KO him but he's not gona outbox him.
     
  15. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    My comparison is only in the sense of how hyped Dirrell is getting based on a light weight resume. Basically he has looked good against tomato cans and journey men and that translates in to schooling Froch.

    When Lacy was coming up all the talk was about his power. Now all the talk is about Dirrells speed. Frich has the jab and the experience to contain Dirrell.

    For the guy who asked me about when Dirrell got badly hurt by a journey man just youtube his fights and you will find 2 examples.