IF JMM beats PBF, would he be the number one boxer out there ?

Tsk Tsk nothing. All you have done since I've called you out is resort to insults because you can't reply back with **** defending yourself.

You got caught, just fess up and get over it.



Because until the result is changed, you official got knocked the **** out in this thread by me.

:hi: But that's usual for you. You've lost any argument you've had on this forum. With the exception of one, which was declared a draw because no one could tell who was sucking Pac's dick better.

This content is protected

Have fun *******.

 

Yup. You can't back **** up that's why you always lose. You fail.

 

I never stated anything about who resorted to insults first.

I did insult your stupid ass, because you were and are being stupid.

And I proved and showed you why you are stupid.

You've done nothing but insult me back and that's all you have done. You have not defended your double standard. You haven't defended anything. All you have is done is insult me with the hope that I will get hurt by what you say over the internet and stop responding.



Clearly you've been hurt by what I've said, prompting you take the "mature" route, to act like you are the better one in the thread. You clearly are not. All you had to do was say I was wrong and it would of been nothing and I would of apologized for calling you stupid.

But you proved my point.

You fail, you're stupid, and you're a *******. Have a nice day. :hi:

 

If JMM wins by KO/TKO, definitely i can put him in #1.

If he wins by close UD or SD, have to think about it more.

Of course Pac can be #1 again if he blows out Cotto in style.

 

atsch

 

Whitaker was seen as elite before he fought Chavez. Sort of like had Hearns beaten Leonard he would have been number one p4p at the end of 1981. But had Bruce Finch beaten Ray a few months later, he would not have been p4p number one.

 

I dont go in for all this p4p **** either, but til Marquez beats pac he cant really be called number one can he. i still think JMM did enough to beat pac, and i dont think i'm alone in this, BUT, officially he lost twice to him didnt he.

 

Taylor wasn't in the top 10 p4p before he beat Hopkins in the first fight while Marquez is number 2 p4p.

 

Officially Pacquiao only beat Marquez once. The first fight is still officially a draw.

 

I know the pac-jmm 2 is debateable who won it. But officially Pac won that fight. I for one thinks JMM won the 2nd fight (but very close), and the first fight is won by Pac (not a draw, as admitted by the judge that he's an idiot).

Hence, it will be awkward for Pac to be #2 if he floored the #1 4x down the canvass. Not to mention, Pac's fights after the JMM fight weren't that bad at all.

 

No. You need to beat the best to be the best.

 

Manny Pac is the number one boxer out there, regardless of the PBF-JMM result.

 

nope, it would be a great win though... maybe even legendary but, he would have to settle the score with Pacman first in order for me to consider him the best

 

this is floyds 1st fight after retirement and a long inactivity. he shouldn't even be ranked p4p. so why would beating an unranked fighter make jmm #1? this has nothing to do with how good floyd is.

on the other hand if floyd beats jmm then he should be ranked based from that fight.

for as long as pac is #1 and jmm does not officially beat him, jmm can't supercede him.