Nate Campbell doesn't deserve a No Contest....

Talk about delusional. Campbell covered up after he ate the headbutt & none of the follow up shots landed. He then backed off & complained, then again 10 seconds later.

 

Doesnt matter if you think he bitched out or not. Its not up to you to decide whether it should be ruled a no contest. The rules clearly state if a cut is caused by a headbutt ( which no one has argued that it wasnt) before round 4, the fight is ruled a nc. You cannot debate the rules or that the cut wa snot caused by a headbutt. Whether you think it was a ***** move or not is not relevent.

 

If he had spots in his eye like he said then he had every right to demand the fight be stopped, however know-one knows if this is true. The cut itself was not that bad at all, Cotto's cut against Clottey was 10 times worse.

 

No kidding...its amazing the lengths people will go to on this site with their bull**** comments. Reminds me of people saying the Margarito situation was hand lotion.

 

Hand lotion atsch:rofl

Someone realy said that?

 

Ha oh ya. You would be surprised how many people..Freddy Wak, Bazooka3, quite a few others I cant recall their names right now.

 

Its ****ing amazes me how much **** can come out of peoples mouths after something like this.

Number 1, If the guy is seeing spots do you know what that means ?
If you cannot understand this in medical terms then shut the **** up.

Number 2, you said that an uppercut hit Nate after the butt, that just goes to show that you must have spots in your eye because Nate had his ****ing glove up and the punch never even touched his face.
Watch the ****ing tape.

Number 3, its easy to talk like a complete asswipe about a fighter from the comfort of your rocking chair at home but unless you've ever been in the ring and laced up the gloves and experienced that situation what your spouting holds zero relevance to anything. Your just making yourself sound like a complete plank on the internet.

Number 4, get your facts in order before coming with arguments as to why it should not be ruled a no contest. The video evidence is plain to see and if you cant see that then your a complete doofus.

Number 5, yes Campbell did not want to carry on fighting, you could say he quit but the point is would you want to fight somebody like Bradley with one eye and also risk damaging the other eye permanently by continuing to fight?

If your willing to lose an eye then that's you but I would prefer to have both of mine.

 

Rahman wasnt winning that fight.

 

Yeas he was, would have won Toney using his Jab alone. Winning by headbutt is not legit win or giving right for idiot nut huggers to say my hero made another man quit.:rofl

 

Never mind should it be No contest or not.

Fact is. Toney wasn’t losing the fight before head but, like Widdow said.
Toney were leading in scorecards at that point.

 

The fight was going to stopped either way. Nate had bleeding behind the eye. Could of very easily lost complete vision in his eye if he fought on.

 

Correct.

 

You know in a way i kind of feel what the ref is saying, this guy quit with not even that bad a cut on his eye. He was extra dramatic about it because he knew he was taking an asswhooping the hell with em'. Give him a tko. Coward!