V Klitschko vs Evander Holyfield circa 2009

Evander would get KO'd at this point. He's ancient.

 

you're a couple of days (and about a thousand posts) ahead of me, thanks to that Bowe thread, but this pretty much sums it up.

 

Please use our language correctly. The word is murder and not homicide.

 

Granted, VK didn't look all that scinitillating in his victory over Gomez, but at this stage, Klit would destroy holyfield by stoppage; it would be a fight that obviously would end Hoylfield's career, but more unfortunately, his health

 

Funniest post you ever wrote was Mayweather has more losses than Margarito.:good You're comedian or something?:huh

 

You are an idiot if you think Evander Holyfield would be anywhere near competitive against Wlad in 2009, let alone actually stand a chance to pull out a W. Wlad by 3 round KO.

 

To be fair he said Vitali and not Wlad.

 

99 Holy though past prime would beat Almost any version of Vitali.

 

Evander has only 27 KOs in his career.. and you don't beat Vitali on points.. ever....

 

Excuse me, BUT when the hell did Vitali become so great? If he was half as good as most people seem to think he is, he would've been able to easily beat the very shitty version of Lewis he met. Holyfield is a class above Vitali. now today Vitali wins easily, but in 99 Holyfield would take him into deep waters & drown him. Winning by either late stoppage or UD.

 

If someone is getting stopped it is Holyfield as beaten so bad his corner throws towel.

 

Lewis 2003 > Holyfield 99

The ancient Holyfield who lost to Lewis lost to Ruiz a year later. But I guess you think that's a great win?

Double standards?

 

Same thing could be said about Holyfield. Holy was a great CW, never a great HW.