Danny Green was Brutal Tonight. US opinions please?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MiracleMan, Aug 15, 2009.

  1. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,386
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bc. he's full of bull****, world dominance and so on, and what is he actually doing, fighting domestic against nobodies. He have no intentions fighting the best, but is only in the game to milk the Australian public, who dosent know better. Where is the pride in that?
     
  2. boxoncottonon

    boxoncottonon Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sitting back reading this thread has been interesting at times but mostly laughable.
    Mainly because of the shite which is comming from you.
    Your attempt here to make a childish point about winning a TIT for TAT I know more than you argument makes you look like a minow in an ocean surrounded by sharks.
    Nobody really gives enough of a **** to make something of your slip up, and this should make you realise how important your contribution is here.

    World Title Dickhead....Undefeated!
     
  3. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    Danny Green has been in the ring magazine rankings top 10 for his division for 4 years, and given how sad the cruiser division is, he may well make it in for this year too.

    That isn't anything for a boxer to be ashamed of, being in the top 10 fighters in the world for your division for 4-5 years. But it isn't world shaking either.

    However he has that crowd pleasing style that most posters here seem to like. I would have thought it would get him more appreciation. But I guess that some people only give credit for that style of fighting if they are already fans of that fighter or that fighter's nationality/ethnicity.

    I do wonder what would have happened if he hadn't have been so brutally raped by corruption in the Beyer fight.
     
  4. DoctorFaustus

    DoctorFaustus New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Corruption???:nono
    He rightfully lost their first encounter because he repeatedly broke the rules. And in their second fight, when Green got his revenge Beyer took him to school.
     
  5. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    It was a disgusting show of corruption.

    Beyer won the rematch fair and square, but the first fight was as bad as any corrupt decision I have ever seen.

    Denying this is like saying that Panama Lewis was a great bloke. Hey, if you want to deny facts, that's fine, but Germany has the single worst reputation in the world for corrupt decisions - and for a very good reason.
     
  6. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    :lol::lol: There was no corruption about it whatsoever.
    The way it unfolded made it a bitter pill to swallow, for sure, but at the end of the day, Green bottled it and has noone to blame but himself.

    Please explain to me how he was robbed?
     
  7. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well, if he was wrongfully given the decision and called the victor, he would have lost the rematch that no doubt would have eventuated.

    End of story.
     
  8. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sure.

    He beat Beyer until Beyer couldn't continue.

    The ref went to give him a warning about a headbutt. The ref looked out of the ring, gets told to end the fight and how to end it.

    All of a sudden the ref changes his mind, and makes it a DQ for a headbutt.

    A headbutt that had virtually no impact and did not cause any injury, and could not cause the fight to end.

    Of course, you are a notorious Mundine cocksucker so it is no wonder you wouldn't give Green any credit.
     
  9. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    9,936
    Likes Received:
    1,163
    the cut was cause by a punch in the 2 round, the fight was stopped on cuts, so Green wins
     
  10. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's how it works in the real world.

    But if you are an apologist for German corruption or a redneck Mundine cocksucker apparently the real world rules dont apply.

    Either way, it's two more ****s to add to my ignore list. I only got so much time on this planet, I ain't gonna waste it on mouthbreathing ******ed ****s.
     
  11. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    Try watching the fight again.
    Beyer was cut from punches, sure. But the final blow was from a headbutt, and it worsened up the cut a lot. It's there for everyone to see.
    Theres then a mix up, and the referee was going to wrongfully rule the fight in Greens favour. The doctor, or whoever intervened and showed the referee the rule book to which he then correctly ruled the fight a DQ.

    The fact that there was a mix up and an intervention doesn't equate to a robbing, it just means that the correct decision had to be shown to the referee before it was made.

    Suck it in. Your boy lost, and no amount of whining, crying from a green machine t shirt wearing psychotic rampant little **** like yourself will change it. :lol:
     
  12. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like you TCW, but we both know that you're not the best of judges when it comes to stuff like this, nor are you capable of being persuaded by facts, so I won't even bother with you.

    Get back to the abo thread in the lounge.
     
  13. ashley

    ashley Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,140
    Likes Received:
    0

    :lol:....the time you have spent here abusing people you could have done something worth while....like jack off :lol:

    Oh well....I guess I am on your ignore list now as well :D
     
  14. pecks

    pecks ***** Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    "The user Pecks has now been added to your "I've been defeated by" list." :good

    So long Thrushman. :hi:
     
  15. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    1
    Abusing certain people is worthwhile.

    The majority of people behave in a way where I can safely say, if they were to die tomorrow, I would know the world was a slightly better place.

    Clinical studies show that there is no way to logically debate with people if they already hold preconceptions or strong biases. The parts of their brain that are connected to logic or analytical reasoning are bypassed - the emotional centres of the brain are instead accessed (to you that is the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, as well as areas associated with negative emotion such as the insula, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala.)
    The person then comes up with some bull**** that makes little logical sense (as their logic centres aren't used) but appeals to their biases.
    It's called "Motivated reasoning". Each time they come up with their bull**** their brain releases endorphins.
    People are literally addicted to their own biases, and the stupidity they spout to reinforce their biases.

    Currently opinion is divided about how to best address this. One theory is to attack the emotional centre of that person's brain to disrupt the process.
    If this theory is correct then abuse is productive.

    Right now I can't say that it is the best approach, because I don't know that it is. Maybe its 50/50. What I do know is that logical arguments are a total waste, and that the abuse may be of benefit and certainly is enjoyable.

    Now, one thing I also know. You didn't come here to learn anything. So the above process has already happened to you, and you have had your nice little endorphin rush from rationalising whatever bull**** you want to post next.

    So yes, you are going on my ignore list. Dumb-junkies are the people who **** the world.