Margarito - should he be banned for life?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lionel Rose, Aug 1, 2009.


  1. FM3O

    FM3O Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Jan 11, 2008
    Yes. An example needs to be made. Boxing is dangerous enough. Using plaster in a fight to gain an extra edge increases the chances of ending a career and/or a life. It's not like baseball where if used a cork filled bat you hit an extra couple homers, boxing aint a game.
     
  2. Lionel Rose

    Lionel Rose Guest

    He's the lowest of the low.
    How can he claim he was unaware of what was going on?
    His 'w' over Cotto MUST be overturned.
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  4. Atritionist

    Atritionist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,473
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    he ddidn't know cuz the questionable substance was slipped into the pad. I questioned the same thing.

    Didn't Alexis Arquello wrap his own fists? Maybe boxers should do the same nowdays, so they can be completely responsible for their wrappings.
     
  5. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,478
    1,737
    Nov 20, 2007
    In Western Civilization you should be proven guilty, not innocent. Margarito's trainer was caught TRYING TO CHEAT, there's absolutely no real evidence of Tony actually cheating before and then again, he doesn't have to prove his innocence, others have to prove he's guilty in other fights. He stepped into the Mosley fight clean.

    Mosley, Jones, Toney and others from all around the world were proven guilty by hard evidence (court testimony, B-sample), yet I don't see "BAN THEM FOREVER :twisted: :twisted:" threads, Mosley didn't even got disqualified for his cheating, fake, opponent health risking performance.

    People shouldn't judge too quickly or if you judge, at least be unbiased and judge other cheaters as well. That's a lesson you guys should learn.
     
  6. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Everyone deserves one second chance. Catch him doing it again though, castrate the ****er.
     
  7. jaystilo

    jaystilo LightsOutLadies Full Member

    280
    0
    Aug 11, 2009
    If it's proven that he knew and he had tarnished Cotto's career by cheating, then YES. Problem is, all we can do is take the mans word for it and that's troubling. He shouldn't get banned for life without proof, but with proof, YES. It bothers me cause I was really rooting for him and I wish I knew the facts. We just don't know. We do know he wil be closely watched in the future and luckily no one got killed or blinded.
     
  8. Maelstrom

    Maelstrom Guest

    Cotto can't even keep Tony off him...much less retire him.
     
  9. boxingwizard

    boxingwizard Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,853
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    No, he should get a second chance but be watched carefully.
     
  10. Saltzy

    Saltzy Bam-O Full Member

    2,815
    17
    Jul 23, 2004
    No.

    And I still say he will beat Cotto again. Its not like he plastered his chin or anything, Cotto couldn't hurt him, got worn out and discouraged.
     
  11. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    No. I think the suspension should be longer though. Some boxers easily take a year off between fights. If he's allowed to fight again, they should make it mandatory for his opponents to wear plaster of paris, to get a taste of his own medicine. :yep
     
  12. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    No, life is about second chances, I believe margo should get one....
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    No. Why the double standard? Tito's wraps are not mentioned. How about Mosley's steroids? Roid Jones' steroids?, etc.?
     
  14. MAYLO

    MAYLO Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    May 21, 2009
    Let him rematch Cotto, get his ass whooped, then ban that *****. That way Cotto gets his revenge and Margacheato gets what he deserves.
     
  15. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,091
    Jul 26, 2004
    No because i want Cotto to get a chance at revenge