List Your Obviously Corrupt/Incorrect Decisions In Boxing Here . . .

thailand

 

byrd-oquendo.

thanks for posting this thread, yesterdays fight with paulie was close, it was by no means a robbery

 

One off the top of my head, Collazo vs. Hatton.

 

Cotto vs. Mosley
Cotto vs. Clottey

 

:huh

 

Golota-Byrd

Golota-Ruiz

 

Mosley DLH 1? Are you ****ing high?

You said clear robberies! It was a close ****ing fight where it was obvious Mosley won.

 

Augustus - Burton.

 

Terrible thread, it's supposed to be about robberies not debatable decisions. Diaz-Malignaggi counts as a robbery for example, no way on earth could anyone competent have scored that 118-110 or even 116-112 for Diaz. Paulie vs. Ngodjou was no way a robbery, Paulie won on the scorecards if you score it, but since he got buzzed badly twice it looks overall like he lost. Pac vs. JMM do not count as robberies, they were close and got close decisions. Same with almost every other fight mentioned in this thread. Real robberies include Chavez vs. Whitaker, Lewis vs. Holyfeild and worst of all Soto vs. Lorenzo. Learn to distinguish the two.

 

To the TS, a lot of the fights you mentioned were competitive bouts that could've gone either way. Those aren't "robberies".

The Martinez/Cintron fight was very recent example of a clear "robbery" in my book.

 

pacquiao vs marquez I... scoring error should of been pacquiao win... what was weird it was admitted by the judge of his wrong score but boxing never fixed the result...

 

I disagree with a lot of your pics. Some of them were close fights that could have gone either way but Mosley vs Hoya 1 in particular was just a horrible pick on your part unless you are criticising the blind judge that scored the fight for Hoya. That was a clear win for Mosley.

 

williams vs. Martinez

 

Lewis Holyfield. Absolute fix. Love how the British judge gave it to Holyfield. The perfect cover. :roll: