Am I Being Unfair to MMA?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by lamarn403, Aug 29, 2009.


  1. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    It's hype because the way it's promoted. It will die down like the stupid ****ing soulja boy song
     
  2. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009


    your the one who said:

    "The elite strikers of MMA are just as good as the best punchers in boxing."

    :lol:did i ever say anything about boxers being able to beat an MMA figher in a MMA fight??? NO

    i was simply comparing striking, thats it.

    now would you please name the best of the best MMA fights you've seen, like i said, MMA is one of my favorite sports.:good
     
  3. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    But you still made this stupid cross-sport comparison.

    And just because I stated that elite MMA strikers are as good a punchers as boxers, does not imply, that they would be good punchers in boxing. All I meant is that MMA's best can stack up very well, in toughness, skill, athletcism and yes, hand striking, against boxing's best. This is, imo, an impressive feat for such a young sport.
     
  4. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    :rofl

    that was in response to your incredibly idiotic comment that said

    "The elite strikers of MMA are just as good as the best punchers in boxing."

    which clearly shows a lack of Boxing knowledge.
     
  5. zorryt

    zorryt Active Member Full Member

    762
    0
    Mar 21, 2009
    That's supposed to be an elite MMA fighter?? he got ko by a jab ??? now I understand why they wrestle in most of those boring fights... Boxing all the way.
     
  6. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    :think NO
     
  7. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    Show me any objective measure which demonstrates that an elite boxer punches better than an elite MMA striker like Fedor. And even if this were possible, I will show you at least 50 other fighting areas where MMA fighters would make boxers look primitive.
     
  8. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    You're a biased idiot. Your knowledge of MMA is stunningly superficial. The most untrained eye can observe that MMA would require, for example, more athleticism than boxing.
     
  9. Black Eyes To You

    Black Eyes To You Alaskan Forever Full Member

    375
    1
    Apr 4, 2005
    MMA is not a sport.
    It may have spectators. But so does bullfighting.
     
  10. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    no you're not

    its garbage, soft gay porn
     
  11. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    dude just stop trying,

    anyway, name the best mma fights cant wait to see them:happy,


    Fedor is gonna drop Rogers, rogers has some serious power but fedor... you know fedor, roger might lose an arm:lol:.
     
  12. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    calm down dude no need for name calling, and if some one's bias here, is you.:hi:
     
  13. Dismantled

    Dismantled Existentialist Full Member

    98
    0
    Oct 9, 2007
    Did you forget that mixed martial artists practice boxing but boxers do not practice mixed martial arts?

    MMA fighters are vastly inferior punchers. End of story.
     
  14. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cxZ1lx_vW8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Cq2b3LV6E

    i dont know you tell me, who's a better puncher, Fedor, or Paul??????:think
     
  15. cfizzl3

    cfizzl3 Active Member Full Member

    860
    0
    Feb 8, 2008
    I'm a boxer, I train with MMA fighters once in awhile.

    I am an amateur and I can fight at 141-152.

    I'll say this. Despite being outweighed on a regular basis of 10-20+ lbs there is a VAST difference in my striking compared to an MMA artist.

    I'm a heavy handed fighter when I need to be, but I'm known for my timing and tricky little counters/defense more so.

    I am by no means feather-fisted, but I'm not the next Urango for that matter.

    Point is even being a smaller individual all 'round, I am almost never bothered by their punching power day in and day out. I have however stopped a few of different one's here and there in sparring matches.

    Although they would be mediocre/decent boxers if they dedicated themselves more to strictly this, I can see the "jack of all/master of none" quite clearly.

    They would never be at the same level as me, or others who are at the national levels.

    I'm not being biased, this is strictly from my OWN personal sparring experiences with REAL mma fighters that fight at 155 and 170lbs, and have various specialties such as muay thai, kick boxing, bjj, etc.

    :bbb I do admire their dedication to being well rounded though, shows they can at least commit to training. anyways cheers and hope this insight is abit telling.