Care to explain how it's ****ing stupid and not even close ? I think you're a ****ing ******, to be so dogmatic.
I voted Bhop surprised hes so far behind on the poll, H2H its a bad style matchup for Tommy because Hopkins could bang at middleweight,iron chin and great defensivly wheres Tommy wasnt to good At 160 on Resume Hearns is superior.
In terms of ability, I think Hearns surpasses B-Hop. Let's not foget that Hearns had absurd power throughout his career, as well as tremendous speed which he proved against accomplished defensive fighters like Benitez and a boxing ability that was almost unsurpassed. I mean, he actually outboxed Ray Leonard when they were both in their primes, and arguably did it again when they were both over the hill. Hopkins is a crafty guy, but I think Hearns' raw eliteness is probably a cut above, both P4P and H2H. In terms of legacy, many will point to Hopkins' long, undisputed run as MW champ as surpassing Hearns, who - supposedly - flopped on the nights where it counted. Still, outboxing a prime Wilfred Benitez over 15 with a broken hand, blowing away Cuevas in 2 and winning titles at 6 weights is no mean feat. Let's not forget that Hopkins also has losses. My vote goes to Tommy.