i know we all agree that RJJ is the best H2H fighter ever

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jkdking, Sep 13, 2009.


Page 4 of 4
  1. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    RJJ may have been the most athletic fighter ever,but I dont rate him number 1 H2H or consider him unbeatable, by ANY STRETCH.
     
    JMP, Sep 14, 2009
    JMP, Sep 14, 2009
    #46
  2. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,441
    294
    Jul 23, 2008
    Carlos Monzon
    middleweight 15 round fight would beat Roy Jones
     
    realsoulja, Sep 14, 2009
    realsoulja, Sep 14, 2009
    #47
  3. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    14
    May 24, 2006
    He wouldnt embarrass hagler. He didnt embarrass Hopkins did he?
     
    elTerrible, Sep 14, 2009
    elTerrible, Sep 14, 2009
    #48
  4. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    you guys are not understanding what i am saying H2H P4P same weights naturally no fighter would beat roy jones. robinson could not deal with roy jones at the same weight naturally. roy jones at robinsons weight would be faster then he was at 168lbs. and jones at 168lbs was faster then robinson. can you picture RJJ with 8oz gloves on. what damage he could do. jones footwork would be unreal at the lower weight class.
    think about this roy jones the fastest fighter ever at 168lbs. just how fast would he be if he was naturally smaller. his timing is unreal he could read a punch before it was thrown
     
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    #49
  5. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    he totally made hopkins look like a b class fighter.
    with one good hand.
     
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    #50
  6. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    carlos monzon u have to do better then that son. out of all the greats u chose him to go up agaisn't the best fighter ever.

    SHOW A BIT OF RESPECT
     
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    jkdking, Sep 14, 2009
    #51
  7. chorizopher

    chorizopher New Member Full Member

    10
    0
    Sep 14, 2009
    Can any define what they mean by pound for pound, what the hell does it really mean? It seems to me to be one of those things that sound plausible but when you think about it for a while, it makes no sense.
     
    chorizopher, Sep 14, 2009
    chorizopher, Sep 14, 2009
    #52
  8. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    Hopkins always struggled with fighters who had a serious speed advantage. Hopkins was great at neutralizing power, skills, size, but not speed.
     
    ramalinga, Sep 14, 2009
    ramalinga, Sep 14, 2009
    #53
  9. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    As far as I'm concerned it means if every boxer was fighting at the same weight who would win head to head. Obviously its nearly impossible to decipher, especially if your matching Ricardo Lopez against Muhammad Ali pound for pound, who the hells gonna know that? Its all guess work really.
     
    essexboy, Sep 14, 2009
    essexboy, Sep 14, 2009
    #54
  10. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Yep! This is a bs thread.:D
     
    Boro chris, Sep 14, 2009
    Boro chris, Sep 14, 2009
    #55
Page 4 of 4