Cotto - Pacquiao size and strength difference...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrtony80, Sep 14, 2009.


  1. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    Many people are starting to say that there isn't a size difference between Pacquiao and Cotto after all. Despite the fact that they may weigh the same, and are around the same height, Cotto began his career fighting at the weight Pacquiao made his bones. Cotto is a natural, albiet somewhat small, welterweight. Pacquiao is not. Pacquiao's weight and him fighting at these higher classes are a result of age, and of course, more opportunity at higher weights.

    A man who is 5'6", 140, is still bigger than a woman who is 5'6", and gained enough weight to weigh 140, because his muscles and body frame sits differently than the woman's frame. The man would still be stronger.

    Cotto is the bigger fighter, bottom line, simply because he is more natural at that weight.
     
  2. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
  3. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    "Noob"? Don't be an internet nerd. I may be new to ESB, but I'm not new to boxing. I could go head-to head with you any day regarding boxing trivia.
     
  4. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    :rofl:lol: You forgot to add STFU
     
  5. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009
  6. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    Yeah, he did forget that...but here I am...a "noob"...and there you guys are...indulging me. Thanks. ;)
     
  7. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    You're welcome.

    Seriously though - after Cotto knocks Pac out everybody who's saying there isn't a size difference will say that the only reason Cotto won is because he was so much bigger than him.
     
  8. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    626
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    why all the hate towards the ts?

    just looking at the 2, cotto looks like the naturally bigger man.

    also, would anyone debate this: pac comfortably makes 140, cotto kills himself to make 140.
     
  9. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Bigger? Yes. But not too much. Paquiao is pretty muscular himself.
     
  10. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008


    STFU noob

    Na seriously, i agree with you. Doesnt seem to be too much of a difference. Pac's a big boy these days. Big head 'n' big bodi
     
  11. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member Full Member

    30,162
    7,066
    May 18, 2006
    Punch nukkas that's is what wins boxing-Pacquio speed's faster and he hit hard and fast.
     
  12. octarine

    octarine Member Full Member

    122
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    i'd say there is a huge height difference in favor of pacman. he's even taller than ron artest!
    This content is protected

    :nut:nut:nut
     
  13. Old Cat

    Old Cat Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Jul 18, 2009

    so true-- they wont shut up ..... Crap like, he started at 106 blah blah blah...............
     
  14. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    stfu noob
     
  15. general

    general UNDISPUTED Full Member

    380
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    STFU Noob:lol: