George Foreman vs Lennox Lewis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Science, Aug 23, 2007.


  1. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
     
  2. Bo Bo Olson

    Bo Bo Olson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    5
    Aug 11, 2004
    Tiny George loses to a good big man.
     
  3. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    TINY GEORGE????? HIS FIST IS BIGGER THAN LENNOXS......HIS LEGS ARE THICKER THAN LENNOXS....LENNOX IS ONLY 1 INCH TALLER THAN GEORGE FOREMAN......HOW IS GEORGE FOREMAN SMALLER?????? GEORGES JAB WOULD OFF SET EVERYTHING LENNOX DID........TUA WENT 12 RDS WITH LENNOX........TUA WOULDNT LAST 5 RDS WITH PRIME FOREMAN......I KNOW STYLES MAKE FIGHTS BUT AS SOON AS LENNOX GOT HIT....HE WOULD BE VERY DEFENSIVE.....AND FOREMAN WOULD CUT OFF THE RING AND MAKE LENNOX WORK HARD.....LENNOX GETS KNOCKED OUT IN 4 RDS......:smoke:smoke:smoke:smoke
     
  4. Bo Bo Olson

    Bo Bo Olson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    5
    Aug 11, 2004
    George was the first big 220-225 pound man to be champ (Clay and Frazer were 195 when they won, and Liston was "so huge" at 210/15)...and looked big, HUGE way back then.....

    Living in Germany I'd not seen Lennox till the fight vs Butler. The one after McCall.....I tuned in just a bit late...and they were panning 236 pound Butler who looked so huge...and then to the for me first look at Lennox....I took an estamate of 212 pounds and you could have knocked me over with a feather 250 pounds???? Where....he looked slim and trim like a young Ali....
    With Forman you knew he was big and bulky or Huge.......Lennox was really huge and didn't look it.
    So at 225 big bulky pounds Tiny Forman loses to slim and trim 250 Lennox IMO of course.
     
  5. Mankind

    Mankind Super Moderator banned

    1,417
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Foreman is one of the most powerful heavyweight to put gloves on.
    The mere fact he could win another title at 47 is a testament to that.

    Lewis did have a suspect chin and it was exposed by smaller fighters.
    he also survived many a close call from the likes of Briggs and Mercer.

    Lewis's size does not save him this time. Any version of Foreman beats Lennox Lewis.
     
  6. Sweet Science

    Sweet Science Peaceful Muslim Warrior Full Member

    1,116
    8
    Jun 20, 2007
    I totally agree with this. No heavyweight in the history of the sport has ever hit harder. People mention Lyle and Shavers, but their power does not exceed Foremans.
     
  7. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    WOULDNT HAPPEN......FOREMAN HAS A BETTER JAB THAN ;EWIS.....AND A MUCH BETTER CHIN......I LIKE LENNOX BUT HE WOULD LOOSE.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,496
    26,029
    Jan 3, 2007
    Not to nit pick here, but I don't think too many people view
    This content is protected
    as being an all time great puncher on par with Foreman or Shavers.
     
  9. Bo Bo Olson

    Bo Bo Olson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    5
    Aug 11, 2004
    Forman's jab is not in the same class as Lennox. Don't see where you got your impression....powerful yes but not fast or all that good.

    Forman 6"3 1/2 reach 82, weight for Fraiser 217....220 for Ali....
    Lenoxx 6'5" 84 inch reach.....238 for McCall, 248 for Butler, 246 for Rahman 2.
    total Reach(height and reach) for Lennox, of 3 1/2 inches.

    Lyle had Foreman down,(great fight) Ali stopped him.
    McCall and Rahman Koed Lennox...don't really know how many times he was down out side of those two times....but all in all, Lenoxx fought better more active and higher rated comp....

    Forman had condition problems, Forte(who), PERALTA(was a good lt.heavy) 1, (Peratala 2 was 10 round KO of 15, and Jimmy Young won in 12.
    You can say it shows his power....but up to Blind in one eye Frazier, he was fed nothing but tommato cans, out side of an old Chevelo and Boone Kirkman.....Perlata wasn't exactly a house hold name.....

    So looking back in mind and Boxrec...it's no wonder I favored Frazier...didn't know about that bad eye...no one did except his trainer.

    I have deleted comments I made about Old Foreman, in that is not relevent to this thread.....
     
  10. JimboDs

    JimboDs So-called expert Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 21, 2007
    Anyone who said Lewis is on crack. Not worth it to elaborate any further.
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Definitly. Lewis has a glass chin, no stamina, little power and no heart, and Foreman was from the 70's. What were those 57 people that voted for Lewis thinking?!
     
  12. JimboDs

    JimboDs So-called expert Full Member

    244
    0
    Sep 21, 2007
    Lewis was a very good tactician. Norton was a better one. This is a no-brainer.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Norton was also a lot more durable and beat The Greatest. He didn't get beat up by journeymen like Lummox Lewis. A no-brainer indeed.
     
  14. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    I pick Lewis over Foreman any times, both at their best. Lennox had equal power, a better stamina, much better boxing skills, a better guard, better punch arsenal, reach-advantages, etc., the only advantage Foreman had was his chin, but I see Lewis carefully outpointing Foreman until the midrounds, where a left- right- combinations TKO´s George...
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,496
    26,029
    Jan 3, 2007

    Thats all well and good Luigi, but please change your avator to a star wars figure.

    Thats what we're doing this week :good