Vitali has never fought a prime, undefeated heavyweight before... I'm picking Arreola

Care to explian why?

 

Why did Byrd never get a rematch?

 

if you need to ask then your just as delusional as the TS. tune in saturday and get back to me

 

You're right.

 

:good

 

This has been explained many times on here. WALDO rematched Byrd for VITLAY and VITLAY rematched Sanders for WALDO.

Both Klitschkos are in fact undefeated, providing you swap their first names around to suit your argument.

Everyone knows Brewster, Purrity and Lewis don't count, as they cheated by winning with punches.

 

I'm prepared to see crow here. Lotta crow. Lots. :yep

 

just a little friendly advice..DONT BET ANY MONEY ON THE DOUGHBOY!Aerreola has fought washed up heavyweights.he'll lose badly!:barttrust me.

 

-----

This will be like Klitschko-Johnson II.

 

Wrong. The delusional one here is you - the Klitschko nutswallower.

Face the FACTS, your boy couldn't man up enough to give a blown up middleweight a rematch.

 

Well, that explains it.

Thanks for clarifying....

 

The question was "what was he ranked at the time of the fight". And that would be 20 places or so above the highest-ranked Arreola has ever faced.

Sanders had pretty good pop and fast hands. He was no slouch especially in the early rounds. I think he would have beaten Arreola that night.

 

Why would he when Byrd had no title after losing to Wlad? Byrd went for the IBF title end of 2002 and Vitali got a crack at Lewis' WBC belt. You're blaming Vitali for going after Lewis instead of Byrd? Vitali was scared of Byrd and he thought Lewis was going to be easier? I get your point but you're a tad out of line here.

Also, wasn't Byrd promoted by Don King during his IBF title reign? That explains why Byrd only faced Wlad again in a mandatory, not Vitali nor Wlad in a voluntary defense.

 

You really think so, or are you just taking the ****?

How much money do you have on the fat one? You'll have a great payoff if he can pull it off. I just don't see it happening. He would have a better shot at Wlad, who seems less comfortable with pressure. Vitali? That man is a stone-cold killer. Mother****er has a cruel streak down deep, I suspect.

 

Seriously, the fact you neglect a) he was dominating that fight and b) he would unquestionably win 10/10 without injury just shows how poor you are at judging boxers.

I don't mean to sound insulting but come on you are just hatin' for hatin'. Only a fool or a blind man would say Vitali looses to bird legitimately.