Who would win, Chris Arreola or Samuel Peter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by David Fanning, Sep 27, 2009.


  1. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    ....seems like an interesting fight that might make sense.
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
  3. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Did you vote for the wrong guy?
     
  4. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    arreola no doubt about it,hes a better boxer and if he doesnt stop him late hell definitly outhustle peter, peter is lazy and one dimensional. Yey say what you want about arreola but he doesnt fight lazy. Although vitali beat a whupping on chris, he does have some skills to go along with his heart and power. Remember he was a national champion as a light heavy. arreola showed me alot more against vitali than peter did. Atleast arreola tried!
     
  5. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    Arreola by WIDE UD, or late tko...
     
  6. ross8503

    ross8503 Member Full Member

    102
    0
    May 31, 2008
    Against Chambers Samuel Peter looked slow and fat, Arreola is good enough to take the fight to Peter and win on points as long as the beating he took from Vitali hasn't left him with emotional scars.
     
  7. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    If they stand in front of each other anybody can go but Arreola's a more technically sound fighter. He throws more accurate punches and is sound in other areas whereas Peter is and has always been quite crude. It would be Arreola's technical acumen that puts him in a better position to land the more telling blows and thus, earn a victory.